«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《地震研究》[ISSN:1000-0666/CN:53-1062/P]

卷:

46

期数:

2023年02期

页码:

204-215

栏目:

出版日期:

2023-06-01

文章信息/Info

Title:

Comparative Analysis of the Activity Characteristics and the Aftershock Forecasting Efficiency of Two Earthquake Sequences in Lushan

作者:

毕金孟¹; 2; 宋 程¹; 马 永¹

(1.天津市地震局,天津 300201; 2.中国地震局地球物理研究所,北京 100081)

Author(s):

BI Jinmeng¹; 2; SONG Cheng¹; MA Yong¹

(1.Tianjin Earthquake Agency,Tianjin 300201,China)(2.Institute of Geophysics,China Earthquake Administration,Beijing 100081,China)

关键词:

芦山地震;  Omi-R-J模型;  检测率;  序列参数;  余震预测效能评估

Keywords:

the Lushan earthquake;  the Omi-R-J model;  detection rate;  sequence parameters;  effectiveness evaluation of aftershork forecasting

分类号:

P315.725

DOI:

10.20015/j.cnki.ISSN1000-0666.2023.0021

摘要:

利用可充分考虑小震信息的Omi-R-J模型,对2013年芦山M_S7.0地震和2022年芦山M_S6.1地震序列活动特征进行对比分析,发现芦山M_S7.0地震序列较芦山M_S6.1地震序列完备性随时间变化更加明显,震后早期检测能力较低,两次地震序列稳定时段检测得到的完整性震级均为1.8级左右。芦山两次地震序列p值差异较小,展示了相对正常的衰减过程; 芦山M_S7.0地震序列k值明显大于芦山M_S6.1地震序列,这或许与芦山M_S7.0地震较为发育的余震或强余震有关; 芦山M_S7.0地震序列b值小于芦山M_S6.1地震序列,表明M_S7.0地震之后芦山地区仍处于较高的应力状态,而M_S6.1地震之后应力处于相对较低的水平。利用N-test方法开展效能评估,结果显示,两次地震序列初期阶段余震发生率展示了较好的预测效能,基于震后初期1天内的数据开展的未来1天的余震预测中,仅有1次预测失效,而在对未来3 d的余震预测中,不存在预测失效的情况。

Abstract:

We used the Omi-R-J model,which can fully make use of the information of small earthquakes,to compare and analyze the characteristics of the activity of two strong-earthquake sequences in Lushan,Sichuan Province.we found that the completeness of the Lushan M_S7.0 earthquake sequence in 2013 changed more obviously with time than that of the Lushan M_S6.1 earthquake sequence in 2022.In the early period after the two mainshocks,a few aftershocks were detected by the Omi-R-J model,and the completeness magnitude detected in the stable period of the two earthquake sequences was both about 1.8.The difference between the p-values of the two Lushan earthquake sequences was small,showing a relatively normal attenuation process of the two sequences.k-value of the M_S7.0 earthquake sequence was significantly larger than that of the M_S6.1 sequence; this may be the result of the relatively more aftershocks or the strong aftershocks of the M_S7.0 sequence.b-value of the M_S7.0 earthquake sequence was smaller than that of the M_S6.1 sequence; this indicated that Lushan area was still in a high-stress state after the 2013 M_S7.0 earthquake,but after the 2022 M_S6.1 earthquake the stress reached a relatively low level.The efficiency evaluation of the N-test method showed that in the initial stage of the two earthquake sequences the aftershock forecasting was efficient.Based on the next day’s data,the forecasting of the aftershocks on the second day after the mainshock only failed once,while the forecasting of the aftershocks of the successive 3 days after the second day of the mainshock did not fail.

参考文献/References:

毕金孟,蒋长胜,来贵娟,等.2022.中国大陆强震的早期余震概率预测效能评估与制约因素[J].地球物理学报,65(7):2532-2545.
房立华,吴建平,王未来,等.2013.四川芦山M_S7.0级地震及其余震序列重定位[J].科学通报,58(20):1901-1909.
蒋长胜,毕金孟,王福昌,等.2018.利用早期余震预测的Omi-R-J方法对2017年四川九寨沟M_S7.0地震的应用研究[J].地球物理学报,61(5):2099-2110.
蒋长胜,庄建仓,龙锋,等.2013.2013年芦山M_S7.0地震序列参数的早期特征:传染型余震序列模型计算结果[J].地震学报,35(5):661-669.
李传友,徐锡伟,甘卫军,等.2013.四川省芦山M_S7.0地震发震构造分析[J].地震地质,35(3):671-683.
李勇,周荣军,赵国华,等.2013.龙门山前缘的芦山地震与逆冲—滑脱褶皱作用[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),40(4):353-363.
梁皓,戴丹青,杨志高,等.2022.2022年6月1日四川芦山6.1级地震应急产品及震源参数初步分析[J].中国地震,38(2):360-369.
吕坚,王晓山,苏金蓉,等.2013.芦山7.0级地震序列的震源位置与震源机制解特征[J].地球物理学报,56(5):1753-1763.
苏金蓉,郑钰,杨建思,等.2013.2013年4月20日四川芦山M7.0级地震与余震精确定位及发震构造初探[J].地球物理学报,56(8):2636-2644.
徐锡伟,陈桂华,于贵华,等.2013a.芦山地震发震构造及其与汶川地震关系讨论[J].地学前缘,20(3):11-20.
徐锡伟,闻学泽,韩竹军,等.2013b.四川芦山7.0级强震:一次典型的盲逆断层型地震[J].科学通报,58(20):1887-1893.
张岳桥,董树文,侯春堂,等.2013.四川芦山2013年M_S7.0地震发震构造初步研究[J].地质学报,87(6):747-758.
中国地震局地球物理研究所.2022.2022年6月1日四川芦山6.1级地震的震源特征[EB/OL].(2022-06-02)[2022-06-28].https://www.cea-igp.ac.cn/kydt/279024.html.
中国地震台网中心.2022.全国地震编目系统地震目录[DB/OL].(2022-06-25)[2022-06-25].http://10.5.160.18/console/exit.action.
周荣军,李勇,苏金蓉,等.2013.四川芦山M_W6.6级地震发震构造[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),40(4):364-370.
Bi J M,Jiang C S.2020a.Comparison of early aftershock forecasting for the 2008 Wenchuan M_S8.0 earthquake[J].Pure and Applied Geophysics,177(1):9-25.
Bi J M,Jiang C S.2020b.Research on the forecasting strategy of early aftershocks in North China[J].Annals of Geophysics,63(4):SE441.
Enescu B,Enescu D,Ito K.2011.Values of b and p:their variations and relation to physical processes for earthquakes in Japan and Romania[J].Romanian Journal of Physics,56(3-4):590-608.
ERC(Earthquake Research Committee report).2016.Information on earthquake forecasting after a large earthquake[J/OL].(2016-08-19)[2022-07-02].https://www.jishin.go.jp/main/yosoku_info/honpen.pdf.
Gerstenberger M C,Rhoades D A,McVerry G H.2016.A hybrid time-dependent probabilistic seismic-hazard model for Canterbury,New Zealand[J].Seismological Research Letters,87(6):1311-1318.
Gerstenberger M C,Wiemer S,Jones L M,et al.2005.Real-time forecasts of tomorrow’s earthquakes in California[J].Nature,435(7040):328-331.
Gutenberg R,Richter C F.1944.Frequency of earthquakes in California[J].Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,34(4):185-188.
Iwata T.2008.Low detection capability of global earthquakes after the occurrence of large earthquakes:Investigation of the Harvard CMT catalogue[J].Geophysical Journal International,174(3):849-856.
Kagan Y Y,Jackson D D.1995.New seismic gap hypothesis:five years after[J].Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth,100(B3):3943-3959.
Lippiello E,Cirillo A,Godano C,et al.2019.Post seismic catalog incompleteness and aftershock forecasting[J].Geosciences,9(8):355.
Marzocchi W,Lombardi A M,Casarotti E.2014.The establishment of an operational earthquake forecasting system in Italy[J].Seismological Research Letters,85(5):961-969.
Metropolis N,Rosenbluth A W,Rosenbluth M N,et al.1953.Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines[J].The Journal of Chemical Physics,21(6):1087-1092.
Michael A J,McBride S K,Hardebeck J L,et al.2020.Statistical seismology and communication of the USGS operational aftershock forecasts for the 30 November 2018 M_W7.1 Anchorage,Alaska,earthquake[J].Seismological Research Letters,91(1):153-173.
Mignan A,Woessner J.2012.Estimating the magnitude of completeness for earthquake catalogs[J/OL].(2012-05)[2022-07-02]Community Online Resource for Statistical Seismicity Analysis,1-45.http://www.corssa.org/export/sites/corssal.galleries/articlespaf/Migan-Woessner-2012-CORSSA-Magitude-of-completeness.pdf-2063069299.pdf.
Nanjo K Z,Tsuruoka H,Yokoi S,et al.2012.Predictability study on the aftershock sequence following the 2011 Tohoku-Oki,Japan,earthquake:first results[J].Geophysical Journal International,191(2):653-658.
Ogata Y,Katsura K,Falcone G,et al 2013.Comprehensive and topical evaluations of earthquake forecasts in terms of number,time,space,and magnitude[J].Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,103(3):1692-1708.
Ogata Y,Katsura K.1993.Analysis of temporal and spatial heterogeneity of magnitude frequency distribution inferred from earthquake catalogues[J].Geophysical Journal International,113(3):727-738.
Ogata Y,Katsura K.2006.Immediate and updated forecasting of aftershock hazard[J].Geophysical Research Letters,33(10):L10305.
Ogata Y.1983.Estimation of the parameters in the modified Omori Formula for aftershock frequencies by the maximum likelihood procedure[J].Journal of Physics of the Earth,31(2):115-124.
Ogata Y.1989.Statistical model for standard seismicity and detection of anomalies by residual analysis[J].Tectonophysics,169(1-3):159-174.
Omi T,Ogata Y,Hirata Y,et al.2013.Forecasting large aftershocks within one day after the main shock[J].Scientific Reports,3(1):2218.
Omi T,Ogata Y,Shiomi K,et al.2016.Automatic aftershock forecasting:a test using real-time seismicity data in Japan[J].Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,106(6):2450-2458.
Omi T,Ogata Y,Shiomi K,et al.2019.Implementation of a real-time system for automatic aftershock forecasting in Japan[J].Seismological Research Letters,90(1):242-250.
Omori F.1894.On aftershocks of earthquakes.Journal of the College of Science[J].Imperial University of Tokyo,7:111-200.
Peng Z G,Zhao P.2009.Migration of early aftershocks following the 2004 Parkfield earthquake[J].Nature Geoscience,2(12):877-881.
Reasenberg P A,Jones L M.1989.Earthquake hazard after a mainshock in California[J].Science,243(4895):1173-1176.
Reverso T,Steacy S,Marsan D.2018.A hybrid ETAS-Coulomb approach to forecast spatiotemporal aftershock rates[J].Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth,123(11):9750-9763.
Schorlemmer D,Gerstenberger M C,Wiemer S,et al 2007.Earthquake likelihood model testing[J].Seismological Research Letters,78(1):17-29.
Schorlemmer D,Werner M J,Marzocchi W,et al 2018.The collaboratory for the study of earthquake predictability:Achievements and priorities[J].Seismological Research Letters,89(4):1305-1313.
Shebalin P,Narteau C.2017.Depth dependent stress revealed by aftershocks[J].Nature Communications,8(1):1317.
Utkucua M,Süleyman S,Nalbant B,et al.2021.The June 12,2017 M6.3 Karaburun-Lesvos earthquake of the Northern Aegean Sea:Aftershock forecasting and stress transfer[J].Tectonophysics,814:228945.
Utsu T,Ogata Y,Matsuura R S.1995.The centenary of the Omori formula for a decay law of aftershock activity[J].Journal of Physics of the Earth,43(1):1-33.
Utsu T.1961.A statistical study of on the occurrence of aftershocks[J].Geophysical Magnitude,30:521-605.
Veen A,Schoenberg F P.2008.Estimation of space-time branching process models in seismology using an em-type algorithm[J].Journal of the American Statistical Association,103(482):614-624.
Wiemer S,Katsumata K.1999.Spatial variability of seismicity parameters in aftershocks zones[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,104(13):13135-13151.
Zechar J D.2010.Evaluating earthquake predictions and earthquake forecasts:a guide for students and new researchers[J/OL].(2010-09-01)[2022-06-29].http://www.corssa.org/export/sites/corssa/.galleries/articles-pdf/zechar.pdf.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

收稿日期:2022-07-09.
基金项目:地震预测开放基金(XH23072D); 中国地震局震情跟踪定向工作任务(2022010116,2020010104).
第一作者简介:毕金孟(1989-),工程师,主要从事地震活动性研究.E-mail:jinmengbi@126.com.

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2023-03-10