|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]张盛峰,张永仙,李莎.CSEP 2.0阶段工作研究进展及中国测试区设计与模型试验[J].地震研究,2025,(02):188-197.[doi:10.20015/j.cnki.ISSN1000-0666.2025.0020 ]
　ZHANG Shengfeng,ZHANG Yongxian,LI Sha.Phase 2.0 of CSEP Work:Progress,Design and Model Forecasting Experiment in the China Test Region[J].Journal of Seismological Research,2025,(02):188-197.[doi:10.20015/j.cnki.ISSN1000-0666.2025.0020 ]
点击复制

CSEP 2.0阶段工作研究进展及中国测试区设计与模型试验(PDF/HTML)

《地震研究》[ISSN:1000-0666/CN:53-1062/P]

卷:
期数:
2025年02期
页码:
188-197
栏目:
出版日期:
2025-02-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
Phase 2.0 of CSEP Work:Progress,Design and Model Forecasting Experiment in the China Test Region
作者:
张盛峰1; 2; 张永仙1; 李莎3
(1.中国地震局地震预测研究所,北京 100036; 2.新西兰地质与核科学研究所,新西兰 下哈特 5040; 3.广西壮族自治区地震局,广西 南宁 530022)
Author(s):
ZHANG Shengfeng1; 2; ZHANG Yongxian1; LI Sha3
(1.Institute of Earthquake Forecasting,China Earthquake Administration,Beijing 100036,China)(2.GNS Science,Avalon 5011,Lower Hutt 5040,New Zealand)(3.Earthquake Agency of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region,Nanning 530022,Guangxi,China)
关键词:
CSEP 2.0;  中国测试区;  PI算法;  效能评估
Keywords:
CSEP 2.0 testing centers;  China testing area;  PI algorithm;  CSEP performance testing techniques
分类号:
P315.72
DOI:
10.20015/j.cnki.ISSN1000-0666.2025.0020
摘要:
由美国南加州地震中心和美国地质调查局共同支持的RELM工作组以及由此进一步发展而来的“地震可预测性国际合作研究”(CSEP)计划开始之后,研究人员围绕地震预测模型和统计检验方法内容的不同测试中心对地震可预测性问题开展了广泛研究。在前期针对CSEP 1.0阶段介绍的基础上,介绍CSEP 2.0阶段的相关内容,包含该阶段发起的背景、发展的总体设计、主要进展以及不同测试区的重点关注内容。针对我国当前的参与情况,初步设计了参与该阶段工作的中国CSEP 2.0测试区范围以及使用图像信息学(PI)算法开展的预测试验。
Abstract:
Since the establishment of the Regional Earthquake Likelihood Models(RELM)working group,jointly initiated by the Southern California Earthquake Center(SCEC)and the U.S.Geological Survey(USGS)in 2000,and the subsequent development of the Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability(CSEP)project,various earthquake forecast models and statistical evaluation methods for assessing their performance have been widely applied.Based on the introduction of Phase 1.0 of CSEP work,this paper primarily introduces the aspects of CSEP 2.0,including its background,overall development design,several key conference discussions,and work plans for different test centers.Additionally,regarding the current participation of China,this paper preliminarily designs the scope of the China CSEP 2.0 test region and conducts a pilot experiment using the Pattern Informatics(PI)algorithm.It is hoped that this work can provide a reference for other models to participate in China CSEP 2.0 work and for the next step of our international co-operation research to be carried out in an orderly manner.

参考文献/References:

韩立波,蒋长胜,李艳娥,等.2012.用于地震可预测性CSEP计划的南北地震带地区地震最小完整性震级MC研究[J].地震,32(1):17-27.
Han L B,Jiang C S,Li Y E,et al.2012.Minimum magnitude of completeness in the North-South seismic belt for collaboratory study of earthquake predictability[J].Earthquake,32(1):17-27.(in Chinese)
蒋长胜,吴忠良.2008.对地震预测的一个统计物理算法在川滇地区的回溯性预测检验[J].中国科学:地球科学,38(7):852-861.
Jiang C S,Wu Z L.2008.A statistical physics algorithm for earthquake prediction in Sichuan-Yunnan region[J].Scientia Sinica Terrae,38(7):852-861.(in Chinese)
吴忠良,陈运泰.2002.地震预测与统计物理[J].物理,31(6):365-371.
Wu Z L,Chen Y T.2002.Earthquake prediction and statistical physics[J].Physics,31(6):365-371.(in Chinese).
吴忠良,王龙,车时,等.2021.中国地震科学实验场:认识与实践[J].地球与行星物理论评,52(3):348-352.
Wu Z L,Wang L,Che S,et al.2021.China seismic experimental site(CSES):planning and test[J].Reviews of Geophysics and Planetary Physics,52(3):348-352.(in Chinese)
张盛峰,郑建常,蒋长胜,等.2017.图像信息学(PI)算法计算参数优化分析——以山东及相邻地区为例[J].地球物理学报,60(12):4633-4643.
Zhang S F,Zheng J C,Jiang C S,et al.2017.Optimal analysis of parameter settings in pattern informatics(PI)algorithm:An example of Shandong and adjacent areas[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics,60(12):4633-4643.(in Chinese)
张盛峰,张永仙.2021.“地震可预测性国际合作研究”——1.0阶段工作理念及成果[J].地震,41(4):203-217.
Zhang S F,Zhang Y X.2021.Collaboratory for the study of earthquake predictability——working philosophy and achievements of CSEP 1.0[J].Earthquake,41(4):203-217.(in Chinese)
张盛峰.2019.中国地震科学实验场暨CSEP-CN计划的若干统计地震学问题[D].北京:中国地震局地球物理研究所.
Zhang S F.2019.Statistical seismological problems associated with CSEP-CN testing region in the context of CSES[D].Beijing:Institute of Geophysics,China Earthquake Administration.(in Chinese)
张小涛,张永仙,夏彩韵,等.2014.利用图像信息方法研究芦山MS7.0地震前川滇及附近地区的图像异常[J].地震学报,36(5):780-789.
Zhang X T,Zhang Y X,Xia C Y,et al.2014.Anomalous seismic activities in the Sichuan-Yunnan region and its adjacent areas before the Lushan MS7.0 earthquake by the pattern informatics method[J].Acta Seismologica Sinica,36(5):780-789.(in Chinese)
Bayona J A,Savran W H,Rhoades D A,et al.2022.Prospective evaluation of multiplicative hybrid earthquake forecasting models in California[J].Geophysical Journal International,229(3):1736-1753.
Christophersen A,Rhoades D A,Gerstenberger M C,et al. 2018. Highlights from the first ten years of the New Zealand earthquake forecast testing center[J].Seismological Research Letters,89(4):1229-1237.
Falcone G,Marzocchi W,Murru M,et al.2017.Earthquake forecasting system in Italy[R/OL].(2017-12-01)[2024-06-30].https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AGUFM.S53B0696F.
Field E H.2007.Overview of the working group for the development of regional earthquake likelihood models(RELM)[J].Seismological Research Letters,78(1):7-16.
Gerstenberger M C,Schorlemmer D.2007.RELM testing center[J].Seismological Research Letters,78(1):30-36.
Holliday J R,Chen C C,Tiampo K F,et al.2007.A RELM earthquake forecast based on pattern informatics[J].Seismological Research Letters,78(1):87-93.
Jiang C S,Wu Z L.2011.PI forecast with or without de-clustering:An experiment for the Sichuan-Yunnan region[J].Natural Hazards and Earth System Science,11(3):697-706.
Jordan T H.2006.Earthquake predictability,brick by brick[J].Seismological Research Letters,77(1):3-6.
Li J W,Mignan A,Sornette D,et al.2023.Predicting the future performance of the planned seismic network in Chinese mainland[J].Seismological Research Letters,94(6):2698-2711.
Michael A J,Werner M J.2018.Preface to the focus section on the collaboratory for the study of earthquake predictability(CSEP):New results and future directions[J].Seismological Research Letters,89(4):1226-1228.
Ogata Y,Omi T.2020.Statistical monitoring and early forecasting of earthquake sequence:Case studies after the 2019 M6.4 Searles Valley Earthquake,California[R/OL].(2020-08-01)[2024-06-30].https://central.scec.org/meetings/2020/am/poster/098.
Pace B,Peruzza L.2009.An earthquake rupture forecast model for central Italy submitted to CSEP project[R/OL].(2009-04-19)[2024-06-30].http://meetings.copernicus.org/egu2009.
Savran W H,Werner M J,Marzocchi W,et al.2020.Pseudoprospective evaluation of UCERF3-ETAS forecasts during the 2019 ridgecrest sequence[J].Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,110(4):1799-1817.
Schorlemmer D,Gerstenberger M,Wiemer S,et al.2007.Earthquake likelihood model testing[J].Seismological Research Letters,78(1):17-29.
Schorlemmer D,Jordan T H,Zechar J D,et al.2006.Collaboratory for the study of earthquake predictability[R/OL].(2006-12-01)[2024-06-30].https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006 AGUFM. S12A.01S.
Shcherbakov R.2020.Bayesian framework for aftershock forecasting and testing[R/OL].(2020-08-01)[2024-06-30].https://central. scec.org/meetings/2020/am/poster/097.
Strader A,Werner M,Bayona J,et al.2018.Prospective evaluation of global earthquake forecast models:2 yrs of observations provide preliminary support for merging smoothed seismicity with geodetic strain rates[J].Seismological Research Letters,89(4):1262-1271.
Taroni M,Marzocchi W,Schorlemmer D,et al.2018.Prospective CSEP evaluation of 1-day,3-month,and 5-yr earthquake forecasts for Italy[J].Seismological Research Letters,89(4):1251-1261.
Werner M J.2020.Experimental design for testing hypotheses of earthquake precursors[R/OL].(2020-08-03)[2024-06-30].https://southern. scec.org/publication/10245.
Woessner J,Wiemer S.2005.Assessing the quality of earthquake catalogues:estimating the magnitude of completeness and its uncertainty[J].Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,95(2):684-698.
Zechar J D,Gerstenberger M C,Rhoades D A.2010a.Likelihood-based tests for evaluating space-rate-magnitude earthquake forecasts[J].Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,100(3):1184-1195.
Zechar J D,Schorlemmer D,Liukis M,et al.2010b.The collaboratory for the study of earthquake predictability perspective on computational earthquake science[J].Concurrency and Computation:Practice and Experience,22(2):1836-1847.
Zhang S F,Wu Z L,Jiang C S.2015.The central China North-South seismic belt:seismicity,ergodicity,and five-year PI forecast in testing[J].Pageoph,173(1):245-254.
Zhang S F,Wu Z L,Zhang Y X.2023.Is the september 5,2022,Luding MS6.8 earthquake an ‘unexpected' event?[J].Earthquake Science,36(1):76-80.
Zhang Y X,Wu Z L,Zhang X D,et al.2019.CSEP 2 from China Perspective[R/OL].(2019-08-15)[2024-06-30].https://southern.scec.org/publication/9711.
Zhuang J C.2020.An ETAS model incorporated with focal mechanisms[R/OL].(2020-08-01)[2024-06-30].https://central.scec. org/meetings/2020/am/poster/101.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2024-06-30.
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(42004038); 中国地震局地震预测研究所基本科研业务专项(CEAIEF2022030206); 地震预测开放基金(XH24005D); 中国地震局和留学基金委英才计划CSC项目(202204190019).
第一作者简介:张盛峰(1988-),副研究员,博士,主要从事地震预测及统计地震学研究.[DW]E-mail:085012104@163.com.
更新日期/Last Update: 2025-03-10