«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《地震研究》[ISSN:1000-0666/CN:53-1062/P]

卷:

45

期数:

2022年01期

页码:

75-87

栏目:

出版日期:

2022-01-20

文章信息/Info

Title:

Multi-scale Wavelet Decomposition and Interpretation of Gravity Anomalies in the Weihe Basin and Its Adjacent Areas

作者:

张永奇¹; 2; 韩美涛²; 张恩会²; 郑增记²; 曹建平²; 宋普伟²

(1.中国地震局地质研究所 地震动力学国家重点实验室,北京 100029; 2.陕西省地震局,陕西 西安 710068)

Author(s):

ZHANG Yongqi¹; 2; HAN Meitao²; ZHANG Enhui²; ZHENG Zengji²; CAO Jianping²; SONG Puwei²

(1.State Key Laboratory of Earthquake Dynamics,Institute of Geology,China Earthquake Administration,Beijing 100029,China)(2.Shaanxi Earthquake Agency,Xi’an 710068,Shaanxi,China)

关键词:

渭河盆地及邻区;  布格重力异常;  小波多尺度分解;  莫霍面深度

Keywords:

the Weihe Basin and its adjacent areas;  Bouguer gravity anomaly;  multi-scale wavelet decomposition;  the Moho depth

分类号:

P315.726

DOI:

10.20015/j.cnki.ISSN1000-0666.2022.0009

摘要:

基于EGM2008重力场模型计算获得了渭河盆地及邻区布格重力异常。采用小波多尺度分解方法对布格重力异常进行了4阶小波逼近和小波细节分解,同时基于平均径向对数功率谱方法定量化地计算出1～4阶小波细节和小波逼近所对应的场源平均埋深。结合区域地质和地震资料,对获得的重力场结果进行分析,得到如下结论:①鄂尔多斯地块、渭河盆地、秦岭造山带3个一级构造单元的布格重力异常之间存在明显差异; 构造区内部重力异常也存在横向的显著差异。布格重力异常的走向、规模、分布特征与二级构造区及主要的断裂具有一定的对应关系。②渭河盆地及邻区布格重力异常1～4阶细节对应4～23 km不同深度的场源信息,鄂尔多斯地块南缘东、西部的地壳结构存在明显的差异; 渭河盆地凹陷、凸起构造区边界清晰,断裂边界与重力异常边界具有较好的一致性; 秦岭造山带重力异常连贯性不好,东、西部重力异常变化特征表现出明显的差异。③渭河盆地及邻区布格重力异常分布与莫霍面埋深具有非常明显的镜像关系。渭河盆地及邻区地震主要分布在六盘山—陇县—宝鸡断裂带、渭河断裂与渭南塬前断裂交汇处、韩城断裂与双泉—临猗断裂交汇处。渭河盆地及邻区重力异常主要由中上地壳剩余密度体所影响,这可能是该区地震以浅源地震为主的主要原因。

Abstract:

Based on the EGM2008 gravity field model,we obtain the Bouguer gravity anomalies in the Weihe Basin and its adjacent areas.And using the wavelet multi-scale decomposition method we decompose the Bouguer gravity anomalies to 4-order wavelet approximation and details.Based on the average,radial,ogarithmic power spectrum,we calculate the average depth of the field source corresponding to 1st,2nd,3rd,and 4th order wavelet approximation and details.Then we analyze the obtaine gravity field on the baiss of the regional geological and seismic data,and get the following conclusions:① The Bouguer gravity anomalies in first-order tectonic units,the Ordos block,the Weihe basin,and the Qinling orogenic belt,are obviously different,and the Bouguer gravity anomalies within each tectonic unit are horizontally different.The trend,scale,and distribution of the Bouguer gravity anomalies correspond with the secondary structural regions and the major faults in the research areas.② The 1st to 4th-order details of the Bouguer gravity anomaly in the Weihe basin and its adjacent areas correspond to the field source information at depths between 4 km and 23 km.The details of the Bouguer gravity anomaly at different orders reveal the following crustal structure features:The crustal structure in the east and west of the southern margin of the Ordos block is obviously different; The boundaries of sags and uplifts in the Weihe Basin are clear and the fault’s boundaries are consistent with the gravity anomaly boundaries; The continuity of gravity anomalies in the Qinling orogenic belt is poor,and the variation characteristics of gravity anomalies in the east region are obviously different with those in the west.③ The distribution of the Bouguer gravity anomalies in the Weihe Basin and its adjacent areas has a clear mirror-image relation with the Moho depth.The earthquakes in the Weihe Basin and its adjacent areas mainly occur in the Liupanshan-Longxian-Baoji fault zone,at the intersection of the Weihe fault and the Weinan Yuanqian fault,and at the intersection of the Hancheng fault and the Shuangquan-Linyi fault.In addition,the gravity anomalies in the Weihe basin and its adjacent areas are mainly affected by the residual density of the middle and upper crust,which may be the reason why the shallow-focus earthquakes are prone to occur in this area.

参考文献/References:

常利军,王椿镛,丁志峰.2011.鄂尔多斯块体及周缘上地幔各项异性研究[J].中国科学:地球科学,41(5):686-699.
邓军,王庆飞,黄定华,等.2005.鄂尔多斯盆地基底演化及其对盖层控制作用[J].地学前缘,12(3):91-99.
刁博,王家林,程顺有,等.2008.塔里木盆地东部重力异常离散小波多分辨分析[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),36(4):555-559.
刁博,王家林,程顺有.2007.重力异常小波多尺度分辨分析分解阶次的确定[J].地球科学,32(4):564-568.
丁韫玉,狄秀玲,袁志祥,等.2000.渭河断陷地壳三维S波速度结构和Vp/V分布图像[J].地球物理学报,43(2):194-202.
方盛明,张先康,嘉世旭,等.2002.华北地区布格重力异常的多尺度分解特征与地震活动性[J].大地测量与地球动力学,22(1):34-39.
冯红武,颜文华,郭瑛霞,等.2019.利用背景噪声成像技术反演陕西及邻区地壳剪切波速度结构[J].地震工程学报,41(4):978-990.
冯希杰,戴王强.2004.渭河盆地断层活动的横向迁移[J].地震学报,26(2):174-182.
韩恒悦,贺明静,李永善.1987.渭河盆地东部地区的活断层[J].地震地质,9(2):85-90.
侯遵泽,杨文采,王允,等.2015.重力场实数尺度小波分解及其应用[J].地球物理学报,58(3):1035-1041.
侯遵泽,杨文采.1997.中国重力异常的小波变换与多尺度分析[J].地球物理学报,40(1):85-95.
姜文亮,张景发.2012.首都圈地区精细地壳结构——基于重力场的反演[J].地球物理学报,55(5):1646-1661.
雷姚琪,张安良.1985.关于渭河盆地的活动断裂、断裂深度及孕震的断裂深部展布条件[J].西北地震学报,7(S1):75-80.
李洪强,高锐,王海燕,等.2014.用深反射大炮对大巴山—秦岭结合部位的地壳下部和上地幔成像[J].地球物理学进展,29(1):102-109.
李晓妮,冯希杰,任隽,等.2012.临潼—长安断裂第四纪活动性勘探[J].西北地震学报,34(4):398-404.
李洋洋,李勇江,姚家骏,等.2020.基于布格重力异常研究运城盆地的构造特征[J].地震工程学报,42(4):919-926.
李永善.1992.西安地裂及渭河盆地活断层研究[M].北京:地震出版社.
刘池洋,赵红格,桂小军,等.2006.鄂尔多斯盆地演化-改造的时空坐标及其成藏(矿)响应[J].地质学报,80(5):617-638.
刘良志,路利春,赵炳坤,等.2018.渭河盆地重磁场特征与断裂构造探讨研究[J].陕西地质,36(1):60-66.
刘天佑.2017.位场勘探数据处理新方法[M].北京:科学出版社.
楼海,王椿镛.2005.川滇地区重力异常的小波分解与解释[J].地震学报,27(5):515-523.
路利春,王鹏,周明霞,等.2017.渭河盆地重力场与构造特征关系研究[J].大地测量与地球动力学,37(S1):36-42.
庞卫东,张建国,沈娅宏.2014.云南地区重力异常的小波分解与解释[J].地震研究,37(4):614-619.
任隽,彭建兵,王夫运,等.2012.渭河盆地及邻区地壳深部结构特征研究[J].地球物理学报,55(9):2939-2947.
任隽.2012.渭河盆地深部地壳结构探测与盆地构造研究[D].西安:长安大学.
任枭,徐志国,杨辉,等.2012.鄂尔多斯地块东南缘地带Moho深度变化特征研究[J].地球物理学报,55(12):4089-4096.
师亚芹,冯希杰,戴王强,等.2008.渭河断裂西安段的展布及其结构特征[J].地震学报,30(6):634-647.
滕吉文.2009.中国地球深部物理学和动力学研究16大重要论点、论据与科学导向[J].地球物理学进展,24(3):801-829.
王谦身,滕吉文,张永谦,等.2015.鄂尔多斯—中秦岭—四川东部的重力异常场与深部地壳结构[J].地球物理学报,58(2):532-541.
徐志萍,姜磊,杨利普,等.2015.利用布格重力资料研究太行山东南缘断裂构造特征[J].大地测量与地球动力学,35(3):503-507.
许家姝,刘立家,刘银萍.2015.Daubechies多尺度小波分析技术及其在漠河盆地断裂带划分中的应用[J].地球物理学进展,29(2):595-602.
许志琴,张国伟.2013.中国(东亚)大陆构造与动力学-科学与技术前沿论坛“中国(东亚)大陆构造与动力学”专题进展[J].中国科学:地球科学,43(10):1527-1538.
杨文采,施志群,侯遵泽,等.2001.离散小波变换与重力异常多重分解[J].地球物理学报,44(4):534-541.
原廷宏,冯希杰.2010.一五五六年华县特大地震[M].北京:地震出版社.
张恩会,石磊,罗娇,等.2018.鄂尔多斯地块及邻区重力均衡研究[J].地震学报,40(6):1-11.
张国伟,孟庆任,赖绍聪.1995a.秦岭造山带的结构构造[J].中国科学:地球科学,25(9):994-1003.
张国伟,张宗清,董云鹏.1995b.秦岭造山带主要构造岩石地层单元的构造性质及其大地构造意义[J].岩石学报,11(2):101-114.
张国伟.1991.试论秦岭造山带岩石圈构造演化基本特征[J].西北大学学报,21(2):77-87.
张少泉,武利均,郭建明,等.1985.中国西部地区门源—平凉—渭南地震测深剖面资料的分析解释[J].地球物理学报,28(5):460-472.
张永奇,韩美涛,曹建平,等.2021.渭河盆地及邻区现今地壳形变及构造特征研究[J].地震工程学报,43(1):79-89.
周鼎武,李文厚,张云翔,等.2002.区域地质综合研究的方法与实践[M].北京:科学出版社.
Berteussen K A.1977.Moho depth determinations based on spectral-ratio analysis of NORSAR long-period P waves[J].Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors,15(1):13-27.
Gomez-Ortiz D,Agarwal B.2005.3DINVER.M:A MATLAB program to invert the gravity anomaly over a 3D horizontal density interface by Parker-Oldenburg’s algorithm[J].Computers & Geosciences,31(4):513-520.
Li Y H,Gao M T,Wu Q J.2014.Crustal thickness map of the Chinese Mainland from teleseismic receiver functions[J].Tectonophysics,611(1):51-60.
Molnar P,Tapponnier P.1975.Cenozoic tectonics of Asia:Effects of a continental collision:Features of recent continental tectonics in Asia can be interpreted as results of the India-Eurasia collision[J].Science,189(4201):419-426.
Pavlis N K,Holmes S A,Kenyon S C, et al.2012.The development and evolution of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008(EGM2008)[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,117:B04406.
Peltzer G,Tapponnier P,Zhang Z, et al.1985.Neogene and Quaternary Faulting in and along the Qinling Shan[J].Nature,317(6037):500-505.
Peltzer G,Tapponnier P.1988.Formation and evolution of strike-slip faults,rifts,and basins during the India-Asia Collision:An experimental approach[J].Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth,93(B12):15085-15117.
Sandwell D T,Smith W H F.2009.Global marine gravity from retracked Geosat and ERS-1 altimetry:Ridge segmentation versus spreading rate[J].Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth,114(B1):B01411.
Spector A,Grant F S.1970.Statistical models for interpreting aeromagnetic data[M].Geophysics,35(2):293-302.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

收稿日期:2021-06-09
基金项目:陕西省地震局启创基金课题(QC202013)、陕西省自然科学基础研究计划——青年项目(2021JQ-962、2021JQ-980)和中国地震局“三结合”提升性课题(3JH-201902006)联合资助.

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2022-01-20