«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《地震研究》[ISSN:1000-0666/CN:53-1062/P]

卷:

45

期数:

2022年02期

页码:

217-228

栏目:

出版日期:

2022-05-20

文章信息/Info

Title:

Geochemical Characteristics and Genesis of Soil Gas CO₂ in the Longxian-Baoji Fault Zone

作者:

刘 洁¹; 李 营²; 陈 志²; 王 新¹; 赵小茂¹; 冯希杰¹; 王景丽¹

(1.陕西省地震局,陕西 西安 710068; 2.中国地震局地震预测研究所 中国地震局地震预测重点实验室,北京 100036)

Author(s):

LIU Jie¹; LI Ying²; CHEN Zhi²; WANG Xin¹; ZHAO Xiaomao¹; FENG Xijie¹; WANG Jingli¹

(1.Shaanxi Earthquake Agency,Xi’an 710068,Shaanxi,China)(2.Institute of Earthquake Forecasting and Key Laboratory of Earthquake Prediction,China Earthquake Administration,Beijing 100036,China)

关键词:

土壤气CO₂;  气体活动强度;  碳稳定同位素;  断层活动性

Keywords:

soil gas CO₂;  intensity of gas activity;  stable carbon isotope;  fault activity

分类号:

P315.724

DOI:

10.20015/j.cnki.ISSN1000-0666.2022.0020

摘要:

陇县—宝鸡断裂带位于青藏块体东北缘,属于鄂尔多斯块体西南缘弧形断裂束的最南段。为对比分析该断裂带的分段活动性强弱特征,利用断裂带逸出气CO₂的地球化学特征进行反演。布设6条跨断层土壤气CO₂测线,进行2期测量,共计获取150个土壤气CO₂组分浓度,计算了气体的相对活动强度; 收集了60件CO₂气体样品,测试了其碳同位素组成。结果表明:岐山—马召断裂的气体活动强度(1.56～2.70)比固关—虢镇断裂的气体活动强度(1.73～1.75)大,且岐山—马召断裂上的CO₂碳同位素组成比固关—虢镇断裂上的CO₂更靠近深部物质端元。位于南段的岐山—马召断裂的地下构造连通性较好,断裂闭锁程度较低,而位于北段的固关—虢镇断裂气体活动性较弱,闭锁程度较高,未来发生地震的危险性较高。

Abstract:

The Longxian-Baoji Fault Zone is located in the northeast edge of the Qinghai-Tibet Block and belongs to the southernmost segment of the arc fault belt in the southwest edge of the Ordos Block.To compare the activity of the Qishan-Mazhao Fault in the south of the Longxian-Baoji Fault Zone with the activty of the Guguan-Guozhen Fault in the north,we study the geochemical features of the soil gas CO₂ in the faults.Six survey profiles for surveying CO₂ are deployed across the two faults and two periods of observation are carried out.We obtain 150 observed values of CO₂ component concentrations.In addition,we collect 60 CO₂ samples for stable carbon isotopic composition measurements.We find that the intensity(1.56-2.70)of CO₂ activity in the Qishan-Mazhao Fault is greater than that(1.73-1.75)in the Guguan-Guozhen Fault.And the source of the CO₂ in the Qishan-Mazhao Fault is closer to the end member of the deep materials.This suggests that the connectivity of the underground structures of the Qishan-Mazhao Fault is better and the fault’s locking degree is lower.Meanwhile,the gas activity in the Guguan-Guozhen Fault is weaker and the fault’s locking degree is higher.Thus,the earthquake risk in this fault zone is higher.

参考文献/References:

杜方,闻学泽,冯建刚,等.2018.六盘山断裂带的地震构造特征与强震危险背景[J].地球物理学报,61(2):545-559.
杜建国,刘从强.2003.同位素地球化学在地震研究方面的作用[J].地震,23(2):99-107.
高曙德,赵洁,王爱国,等.2021.西秦岭北缘断裂带土壤气定点监测与初步结果分析[J].地震工程学报,43(5):1001-1007.
韩晓昆.2014.首都圈地震重点监测区土壤气体地球化学[D].北京:中国地震局地震预测研究所.
李强.2013.汶川地震后青藏高原东北缘GPS地壳形变场特征研究[D].北京:中国地震局地震预测研究所.
李新男.2017.鄂尔多斯西南缘活动构造几何图像,运动特征及构造变形模式[D].北京:中国地震局地质研究所.
李营,杜建国,王富宽,等.2009.延怀盆地土壤气体地球化学特征[J].地震学报,31(1):82-91.
刘兆飞.2020.鄂尔多斯盆地西缘断裂带气体地球化学特征[D].北京:中国地震局地震预测研究所.
马致远,吴敏,郑会菊,等.2018.对关中盆地腹部深层地下热水δ¹⁸O富集[J].地质通报,37(2):487-495.
邵永新.2012.土壤氡方法用于断层活动性研究的讨论[J].中国地震,28(1):51-60.
孙小龙,刘耀炜,付虹,等.2020.我国地震地下流体学科分析预报研究进展回顾[J].地震研究,43(2):216-232.
王小娟,韩晓昆,陈志,等.2016.六盘山东麓断裂带逸出气氡浓度特征分析[J].地震工程学报,38(增刊2):276-281.
王云,赵慈平,冉华,等.2015.地壳流体CO₂的释放与地震关系:回顾与展望[J].地震研究,38(1):119-130.
薛峰.2014.六盘山地区现今三维地壳运动与变形特征研究[D].兰州:中国地震局兰州地震研究所.
叶茂盛,孟国杰,苏小宁,等.2018.青藏高原东北缘主要断裂闭锁特征和滑动亏损研究[J].地震,38(3):1-12.
约享.霍夫斯.2012.稳定同位素地球化学[M].吴石头,王洋洋,肖益林,译.北京:地质出版社.
张新科,邵辉成,冯亮亮,等.2017.陇县—宝鸡断裂带地震活动分析[J].高原地震,29(1):19-25.
张扬,戴波,周晓成.2016.郯庐断裂带江苏段土壤气体地球化学特征研究[J].地震研究,39(3):444-450.
周晓成,孙凤霞,陈志,等.2017.汶川M_S8.0地震破裂带CO₂、CH₄、Rn和Hg脱气强度[J].岩石学报,33(1):291-303.
Annunziatellis A,Beaubien S E,Bigi S,et al.2008.Gas migration along fault systems and through the vadose zone in the Latera caldera(central Italy):Implications for CO₂ geological storage[J].International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control,2(3):353-372.
Bond C E,Kremer Y,Johnson G,et al.2017.The physical characteristics of a CO₂ seeping fault:The implications of fracture permeability for carbon capture and storage integrity[J].International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control,61:49-60.
Br?uer K,K?mpf H,Koch U,et al.2007.Seismically induced chanfes of the fluid signature detected by a muti-isotope approach(He,CO₂,CH₄,N₂)at the Wettinguelle,Bad Brambach(central Europe)[J].Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth,112(B4):1-15.
Chen Z,Li Y,Martinelli G,et al.2020.Spatial and temporal variations of CO₂ emissions from the active fault zones in the capital area of China[J].Applied Geochemistry,112:104489.
Fu C C,Yang T,Chen C H,et al.2017.Exploring the relationship between soil degassing and seismic activity by continuous radon monitoring in the Longitudinal Valley of eastern Taiwan[J].Chemical Geology,469:163-175.
Giammanco S,Gurrieri S,Valenza M.1998.Anomalous soil CO₂,degassing in relation to faults and eruptive fissures on Mount Etna(Sicily,Italy)[J].Bulletin of Volcanology,60(4):252-259.
King C Y,King B S,Evans W C,et al.1996.Spatial radon anomalies on active faults in California[J].Applied Geochemistry,11(4):497-510.
Li X N,Feng X J,Li G Y,et al.2019.Geological and geomorphological evidence for active faulting of the southern Liupanshan fault zone,NE Tibetan Plateau[J].Geomorphology,345(15):106849.
Li Y,Du J G,Wang X,et al.2013.Spatial variations of soil gas geochemistry in the Tangshan Area of Northern China[J].Terrestrial Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences,24(3):323-332.
Ma Z Y,Yu J,Yan S,et al.2010.δ¹⁸O shifts of geothermal waters in the central of Weihe Basin,NW China[J].Environmental Earth Science,59(5):995-1008.
Martino R,Capasso G,Camarda M.2016.Spatial domain analysis of carbon dioxide from soils on Vulcano Island:Implications for CO₂ output evaluation[J].Chemical Geology,444:59-70.
Seminsky K Z,Demberel S.2013.The first estimations of soil-radon activity near faults in Central Mongolia[J].Radiation Measurements,49(1):19-34.
Su X N,Yao Y B,Wu W W,et al.2019.Crustal deformation on the Northeastern Margin of the Tibetan Plateau from continuous GPS Observations[J].Remote Sensing,11(1),34:1-21.
Sun X L,Yang P T,Yang X,et al.2018.Across-fault distributions of radon concentrations in soil gas for different tectonic environments[J].Geoences Journal,22:227-239.
Walia V,Yang T F,Hong W L,et al.2009.Geochemical variation of soil-gas composition for fault trace and earthquake precursory studies along the Hsincheng fault in NW Taiwan[J].Applied Radiation & Isotopes,67(10):1855-1863.
Wang G,Liu C,Wang J,et al.2006.The use of soil mercury and radon gas surveys to assist the detection of concealed faults in Fuzhou City,China Environmental Geology,51(1):83-90.
Wang S D,Shi Y Q,Feng X J,et al.2021.Late Quaternary sinistral strike-slipping of the Liupanshan-Baoji fault zone:Implications for the growth of the northeastern Tibetan Plateau[J].Geomorphology,380(8):107628.
Wang X,Li Y,Du J G,et al.2014.Correlations between radon in soil gas and the activity of seismogenic faults in the Tangshan area,North China[J].Radiation Measurements,60:8-14.
Weise S M,Br?uer K,K?mpf H,et al.2001.Transport of mantle volatiles through the crust traced by seismically released fluids:a natural experiment in the earthquakeswarm area Vogtland/NW Bohemia Central Europe[J].Tectonophysics,336(1-4):137-150.
Yang Y,Li Y,Li Y G,et al.2021.Present-day activity of the Anninghe Fault and Zemuhe Fault,Southeastern Tibetan Plateau,derived from soil gas CO₂ emissions and locking degree[J].Earth and Space Science,10.1029/2020EA001607.
Zhou H,Su H,Zhang H,et al.2020.Geochemical characteristics of soil gas and strong seismic hazard potential in the Liupanshan Fault Zone(LPSFZ)[J].Geofluids,(7):1-14.
Zhou Z H,Tian L,Zhao J,et al.2020.Stress-related pre-seismic water radon concentration variations in the Panjin observation well,China(1994-2020)[J].Frontiers in Earth Science,8:596283.
Zhou Z H,Zhong J,Zhao J,et al.2021.Two mechanisms of earthquake-induced hydrochemical variations in an observation well[J]. Water,13:2385.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

收稿日期:2021-11-23
基金项目:中国地震局地震预测开放基金(2021EFOF03)、陕西省自然科学基金(2022JQ-254)和中国地震局震情跟踪定向工作任务(2022010502、2021010309)联合资助.

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2022-05-20