«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《地震研究》[ISSN:1000-0666/CN:53-1062/P]

卷:

45

期数:

2022年02期

页码:

249-256

栏目:

出版日期:

2022-05-20

文章信息/Info

Title:

Geochemical Characteristics of the Soil Gas in the Ruichang-Wuning Active Fault Zone

作者:

鲍志诚¹; 2; 赵爱平²; 吕 坚²; 肖 健²; 周红艳²; 宁洪涛²; 汤兰荣²; 陈 浩²

(1.江西省地震局 江西省防震减灾与工程地质灾害探测工程研究中心,江西 南昌 330013; 2.江西省地震局,江西 南昌 330026)

Author(s):

BAO Zhicheng¹; 2; ZHAO Aiping²; LYU Jian²; XIAO Jian²; ZHOU Hongyan²; NING Hongtao²; TANG Lanrong²; CHEN Hao²

(1.Disaster Prevention and Engineering Geological Disaster Detection of Jiangxi Province,Jiangxi Earthquake Agency,Nanchang 330013,Jiangxi,China)(2.Jiangxi Earthquake Agency,Nanchang 330026,Jiangxi,China)

关键词:

瑞昌—武宁断裂带;  土壤气;  释放特征;  气体来源

Keywords:

the Ruichang-Wuning fault zone;  soil gas;  gas release characteristics;  gas source

分类号:

P315.724

DOI:

10.20015/j.cnki.ISSN1000-0666.2022.0021

摘要:

对瑞昌—武宁断裂带瑞昌段进行了跨断层气体地球化学流动测量,测定了断裂带土壤气Rn和CO₂浓度,分析了该断裂带的气体地球化学特征,结合赣南地区b值讨论了断裂带气体分布特征与构造活动性的可能关系。结果显示:桂林桥、伍家畈土壤气Rn和CO₂浓度均表现出强正相关特征,说明断裂带Rn是基于CO₂载气运移至地表浅层。Rn和CO₂浓度峰值均出现在断裂带附近,桂林桥测线中部土壤气浓度明显高于两端,而伍家畈测线中部与两端浓度平均值相对接近,这种浓度空间释放特征的差异可能主要是震后断裂带愈合程度不一所致。两条测线土壤气Rn浓度水平较高,b值扫描发现研究区应力呈增强趋势,表明断裂带活动性较强,可能意示土壤气Rn浓度与断裂带的活动性有着密切的联系。

Abstract:

Based on the distribution of the concentration of the soil gas Rn and CO₂ in the Ruichang-Wuning Active Fault Zone obtained by cross-fault observation in the field,we analyze the geochemical characteristics of Rn and CO₂ in the Fault Zone,and reveal the relationship between the geochemical characteristics of the two soil gases and the Fault Zone.The results show that the strong correlation of Rn and CO₂ concentration indicates that in the Fault Zone Rn migrates to the shallow surface along with CO₂.The peak concentrations of Rn and CO₂ soil appear near the Fault Zone.The concentration of Rn and CO₂ in the middle of the Guilinqiao survery line is obviously higher than that at both ends of the line,while the average concentrations in the middle and both ends of the Wujiafan survey line are relatively close.The concentrations differ spatially mainly because of the different degrees of fault healing after the earthquake.The concentration of Rn in both the two survey lines is high,and the b-value scanning shows that the stress in the study area is increasing,indicating that the Fault activity is strong.This suggests that the concentration of Rn is closely related to the activity of the Ruichang-Wuning Active Fault Zone.

参考文献/References:

鲍志诚,高小其,张磊,等.2019.九江地震台观测井水氢氧同位素特征及意义[J].中国地震,35(3):499-508.
鲍志诚,赵影,赵爱平,等.2021.九江地区地下水水文地球化学特征及成因[J].大地测量与地球动力学,41(5):471-477.
崔月菊,杜建国,陈杨,等.2016.汶川M_S8.0地震前后龙门山断裂带CO₂和CH₄排气增强[J].地震研究,39(2):239-245.
杜建国,康春丽.2000a.地震地下流体发展概述[J].地震,20(S1):107-113.
杜建国,康春丽.2000b.强地震前兆异常特征与深部流体作用探讨[J].地震,20(3):95-101.
杜建国,仵柯田,孙凤霞.2018.地震成因综述[J].地震前缘,25(4):255-267.
杜乐天.2005.地球排气作用的重大意义及研究进展[J].地质评论,51(2):174-179.
方震,张彬,李军辉.2019.庐江地热温泉区活动断裂土壤气氡(Rn)释放对环境的影响[J].环境化学,38(8):1906-1911.
李全林,陈锦标,于渌,等.1978.b值时空扫描——监视破坏性地震孕育过程的一种手段[J].地球物理学报,21(2):101-125.
李营,杜建国,王富宽,等.2009.延怀盆地土壤气体地球化学特征[J].地震学报,31(1):82-91.
刘耀炜.2006.我国地震地下流体科学40年探索历程回顾[J].中国地震,22(3):222-235.
吕坚,郑勇,倪四道,等.2008.2005年11月26日九江—瑞昌M_S5.7、M_S4.8地震的震源机制解与发震构造研究[J].地球物理学报,51(1):158-164.
孟亚锋,姚华建,王行舟,等.2019.基于背景噪声成像方法研究郯庐断裂带中南段及邻区地壳速度结构与变形特征[J].地球物理学报,62(7):2490-2509.
苏鹤军,张慧,刘旭宙.2005.兰州市刘家堡隐伏断层的地球化学探测方法试验[J].高原地震,17(1):9-16.
孙小龙,王广才,邵志刚,等.2016.海原断裂带土壤气与地下水地球化学特征研究[J].地学前缘,23(3):140-150.
陶明信,徐永昌,史宝光,等.2005.中国不同类型断裂带的地幔脱气与深部地质构造特征[J].中国科学:地球科学,35(5):441-451.
汪成民,李宣瑚,魏柏林.1991.断层气测量在地震科学的应用[M].北京:地震出版社.
王喜龙,李营,杜建国,等.2017.首都圈地区土壤气 Rn,Hg,CO₂ 地球化学特征及其成因[J].地震学报,39(1):85-101.
杨江,李营,陈志,等.2019.唐山断裂带南西段和北东段土壤气Rn和CO₂浓度特征[J].地震,39(3):61-70.
曾新福,汤兰荣,陶鑫,等.2016.跨断层综合地质剖面法在隐伏断层野外地质调查中的研究与应用——以瑞昌—武宁断裂为例[J].中国地震,32(4):607-617.
张磊,高小其,包创,等.2018.呼图壁地下储气库构造气体地球化学特征[J].地震地质,40(5):1059-1071.
张扬,戴波,周晓成.2016.郯庐断裂带江苏段土壤气地球化学特征研究[J].地震研究,39(3):444-449.
郑海刚,方震,周晓成,等.2016.郯庐断裂带安徽段土壤气体的地球化学特征[J].中国地震,32(4):642-652.
中国地震局地质研究所,中国地震局工程力学研究所,江西省防震减灾工程研究所.2006.江西核电彭泽厂址可行性研究阶段地震安全性评价报告[R].北京:中国地震局地质研究所.
周晓成,陈超,吕超甲,等.2017.首都圈西北部主要活动断裂土壤气中氢气(H₂)地球化学特征[J].环境化学,36(5):977-983.
Annunziatelli A,Ciotoli G,Lombardi S,et al.2003.Short and long term gas hazard:The release of toxic gases in the Alban Hills Volcanic Area(Italy)[J].J Geoch em Explor,77(2-3):93-108.
Baubron J,Rigo A,Toutain J.2002.Soil gas profiles as a tool to characterise active tectonic areas:The Jaut Pass example(Pyrenees,France)[J].Earth Planet Sci Lett,196(1/2):69-81.
Chen Z,Li Y,Liu Z F,et al.2019.Evidence of multiple sources of soil gas in the Tangshan Fault Zone,North China[J].Geoflfluids,1-12.
Chen Z,Li Y,Liu Z,et al.2018.Radon emission from soil gases in the active fault zones in the capital area and its environmental effects[J].Scientific Reports,8:1-12.
Ciotoli G,Lombardi S,Annunziatellis A.2007.Geostatistical analysis of soil gas data in a high seismic intermontane basin:Fucino Plain,central Italy[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,112(B5):1-23.
Etiope G,Martinelli G.2002.Migration of carrier and trace gases in the geosphere:An overview[J].Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors,129(3-4):185-204.
Fu C C,Yang T F,Walia V,et al.2005.Reconnaissance of soil gas composition over the buried fault and fracture zone in southern Taiwan[J].Geochem J,39(5):427-439.
Gutenberg B,Richter C F.1944.Frequency of earthquakes in California[J].Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,34(4):185-188.
Han X K,Li Y,Du J G,et al.2014.Rn and CO₂ geochemistry of soil gas across the active fault zones in the capital area of China[J].Nat Hazaeds Earth Syst Sci,14(10):2803-2815.
Irwin W P,Barnes I.1980.Tectonic relation of carbon dioxide discharges and earthquakes[J].J Geop hys Res,85(B6):3115-3121.
King C,King B,Evans W,et al.1996.Spatial radon anomalies on active faults in California[J].Appl Geochem,11(4):497-510.
Li Y,Du J G,Wang F K,et al.2010.Geochemical characteristics of soil gas in the Yanhuai basin,Northern China[J].Earthquake Science,22(1):93-100.
Li Y,Du J G,Wang X,et al.2013.Geochemical characteristics of soil gases in the Tangshan area,Northern China,Terr[J].Atmos Ocean Sci,24:323-332.
Sugisakir R.1983.Origin of hydrogen and carbon dioxide in fault gases and its relation to fault activity[J].J Geo L,91:239-258.
Sun X L,Yang P T,Xiang Y,et al.2018.Across-fault distributions of radon concentrations in soil gas for different tectonic environments[J].Geosciences Journal,22(2):227-239.
Sun Y T,Zhou X C,Yan Y C,et al.2021.Soil degassing from the Xianshuihe-Xiaojiang Fault System at the eastern boundary of the Chuan-Dian Rhombic Block,Southwest China[J].Front Earth Sci,9:1-12.
Walia V,Yang T,Hong W,et al.2009.Geochemical variation of soil-gas composition for fault trace and earthquake precursory studies along the Hsincheng fault in NW Taiwan[J].Appl Radiat Isotopes,67(10):1855-1863.
Xiang Y,Sun X L,Liu D Y,et al.2020.Spatial distribution of Rn,CO₂,Hg,and H₂ concentrations in soil gas across a thrust fault in Xinjiang,China[J].Front Earth Sci,8:1-9.
Yang T F,Chou C Y,Chen C H,et al.2003.Exhalation of radon and its carrier gases in SW Taiwan[J].Radiation Measurements,36(1/6):425-429.
Zhou H L,Su H J,Zhang H,et al.2017.Correlations between soil gas and seismic activity in the generalized Haiyuan Fault Zone,North-central China[J].Nat Hazards,85(2):763-776.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

收稿日期:2021-10-17
基金项目:江西省防震减灾与工程地质灾害探测工程研究中心项目(SDGD202019)和国家自然基金面上项目(41574057)联合资助.

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2022-05-20