«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

HTML)

《地震研究》[ISSN:1000-0666/CN:53-1062/P]

卷:
期数:: 2025年02期

页码:: 220-228

栏目:

出版日期:: 2025-02-10

文章信息/Info

Title:: Test and Application of the Foreshock Identification Method Based on the Load/Unload Response Ratio

作者:: 李泽平¹; 2; 余怀忠^3; 杨志高³; 张靖雪³; (1.中国地震局地震研究所,湖北武汉 430071; 2.湖北省地震局,湖北武汉 430071; 3.中国地震台网中心,北京 100045)

Author(s):: LI Zeping¹; 2; YU Huaizhong³; YANG Zhigao³; ZHANG Jingxue³; (1.Institute of Seismology,China Earthquake Administration,Wuhan 430071,Hubei,China)(2.Hubei Earthquake Agency,Wuhan 430071,Hubei,China)(3.China Earthquake Networks Center,Beijing 100045,China)

关键词:: 加卸载响应比; 固体潮; 前震; 震后趋势分析; 地震预测

Keywords:: Load/Unload Response Ratio; foreshock; earth tide; analysis of the post-earthquake risk tend; earthquake prediction

分类号:: P315.72

DOI:: 10.20015/j.cnki.ISSN1000-0666.2025.0023

摘要:: 为了验证改进的加卸载响应比方法在前震识别中的有效性,对基于该方法开发的前震识别系统自动产出的地震预测结果进行整理分析。统计2021年10月—2024年4月中国大陆西部地区190次4级以上非前震地震,发现处于固体潮加载阶段的地震占比为35.8%,卸载阶段占比更大,为64.2%。统计了2021年5月21日云南漾濞6.4级地震的4次前震、2021年12月24日老挝6.0级地震的2次前震和2022年6月10日四川马尔康6.0级地震的3次前震的固体潮的加卸载状态,发现所有前震均在固体潮加载阶段发生。结合前震判定和震后趋势分析的“交通灯”模型,对2024年4月10日新疆拜城5.6级震群、1月23日新疆乌什7.1级余震序列以及4月3日台湾花莲7.3级地震的2次强余震(6.3级、6.2级)的加卸载判定结果进行研究,并对原震区后续强震危险性进行了分析,结果显示加载地震后发生更强地震的情况与后续实际地震发震情况较为符合。通过R值评分和概率增益分析可知,在95%置信度下,R>R₀、概率增益Gain>1,表示基于LURR的前震识别方法能够通过显著性检验,并且有较好的预测效能,说明该方法适用于中国大陆西部地区震后趋势的实时判定。

Abstract:: We sorted out and analyzed the forecasting results produced by the foreshock identification system developed based on the improved Load/Unload Response Ratio(LURR)method to verify the effectiveness of this method in foreshock identification.The western region of Chinese mainland was selected as the study area.In this region,64.2% of all 190 non-foreshocks(M>4.0)occurred during the unloading process,while the remaining events triggered during the loading process.The results indicated that non-foreshocks were more likely to occur during the unloading process.All the 4 foreshocks of the Yangbi M_S6.4 earthquake in Yunnan on May 21,2021,2 foreshocks of the Laos M_S6.0 earthquake on December 24,2021,and 3 foreshocks of the Maerkang M_S6.0 earthquake in Sichuan on June 10,2022 were triggered during the loading process.Further,by using the “traffic light” model for foreshock identification and seismic risk analysis,we categorized the loading/unloading states and researched the risk of strong earthquakes in seismogenic areas for the Baicheng M_S5.6 earthquake sequence on April 10,2024,the Wushi M_S7.1 sequence on January 23,2024 in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region,and two strong aftershocks(M_S6.3,M_S6.2)of the Hualien M_S7.3 earthquake sequence on April 3,2023 in Chinese Taiwan.The results showed that the occurrence of stronger earthquakes after loading earthquake was consistent with the actual earthquake situation.Analyzing with R-value and probability gain,we can see that R-value is greater than R₀-value with 95% confidence and the probability gain is greater than 1,this indicates that the foreshock identification method based on the Load/Unload Response Ratio(LURR)can pass the significance test,and the prediction effect is good.This method is suitable for real-time assessment of the seismic risk trend in the western region of the Chinese mainland.

参考文献/References:

蒋长胜,张浪平,韩立波,等.2011.中长期地震危险性概率预测中的统计检验方法I:Molchan图表法[J].地震,31(2):106-113.
Jiang C S,Zhang L P,Han L B,et al.2011.Probabilistic forecasting method of long-term and intermediate-term seismic hazard I:Molchan error diagram[J].Earthquake,31(2):106-113.(in Chinese)
蒋海昆,周少辉.2020.前震:预测意义及识别方法[J].地震地磁观测与研究,41(5):222-225.
Jiang H K,Zhou S H.2020.Foreshock,predicting significance and distinguishing methods[J].Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research,41(5):222-225.(in Chinese)
李泽平,余怀忠,晏锐,等.2024.基于LURR的前震分析方法及其在川滇地区的应用[J].地球物理学报,67(6):2248-2271.
Li Z P,Yu H Z,Yan R,et al.The foreshock analysis technique based on the LURR method and its application in Sichuan-Yunnan region[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics,67(6):2248-2271.(in Chinese)
刘月,田勤俭,张永仙,等.2023.于田地区强震前加卸载响应比异常及强震复发间隔[J].地球物理学报,66(2):616-625.
Liu Y,Tian Q J,Zhang Y X,et al.2023.Load-Unload Response Ratio anomalies before the Yutian strong earthquakes and its earthquake recurrence interval estimation[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics,66(2):616-625.(in Chinese)
马瑾,郭彦双.2014.失稳前断层加速协同化的实验室证据和地震实例[J].地震地质,36(3):547-561.
Ma J,Guo Y S.2014.Accelerated synergism prior to fault instability:Evidence from laboratory experiments and an earthquake case[J].Seismology and Geology,36(3):547-561.(in Chinese)
马玉川,晏锐,王广才,等.2022.1976年唐山7.8级地震前地下水位变化与地震成核过程的关系[J].地球物理学报,65(4):1325-1335.
Ma Y C,Yan R,Wang G C,et al.2022.Groundwater level changes before the 1976 Tangshan M_S7.8 earthquake and its relation with the earthquake nucleation process[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics,65(4):1325-1335.(in Chinese)
梅世蓉,冯德益,张国民,等.1993.中国地震预报概论[M].北京:地震出版社.
Mei S R,Feng D Y,Zhang G M,et al.1993.Introduction to Earthquake Prediction in China[M].Beijing:Seismological Press.(in Chinese)
梅世蓉.1995.地震前兆场物理模式与前兆时空分布机制研究(一)——坚固体孕震模式的由来与证据[J].地震学报,17(3):273-282.
Mei S R.1995.Study on physical model of earthquake precursor field and temporal and spatial distribution mechanism of earthquake precursors(I):Origin and evidence of solid seismogenic model[J].Acta Seismologica Sinica,17(3):273-282.(in Chinese)
薛艳,解孟雨,刘杰,等.2021.全球M_W≥8.0浅源地震的前震序列研究[J].地震地质,43(5):1233-1249.
Xue Y,Xie M Y,Liu J,et al.2021.Study on foreshock sequences of the global great shallow-focus earthquakes with M_W≥8.0[J].Seismology and Geology,43(5):1233-1249.(in Chinese)
姚琪,王辉,刘杰,等.2023.基于数值模拟和地震活动性统计的混合地震预测:在中国地震科学实验场的应用[J].地球物理学报,66(10):4162-4175.
Yao Q,Wang H,Liu J,et al.2023.A hybrid method of earthquake forecasting based on numerical simulation and seismicity statistics:An application to China Seismic Experimental Site[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics,66(10):4162-4175.(in Chinese)
尹祥础,陈学忠,宋治平,等.1994.加卸载响应比——一种新的地震预报方法[J].地球物理学报,37(6):767-775.
Yin X C,Chen X Z,Song Z P,et al.1994.The Load-Unload Response Ratio theory:A new approach to earthquake prediction[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics,37(6):767-775.(in Chinese)
张国民,李丽.2003.地壳介质的流变性与孕震模型[J].地震地质,25(1):1-10.
Zhang G M,Li L.2003.Rheology of crustal media and a related seismogenic model[J].Seismology and Geology,25(1):1-10.(in Chinese)
赵永红,谢雨晴,王航,等.2017.地震预测方法Ⅴ:地下流体方法[J].地球物理学进展,32(4):1539-1547.
Zhao Y H,Xie Y Q,Wang H,et al.2017.Earthquake predictionⅤ:subsurface fluid method[J].Progress in Geophysics,32(4):1539-1547.(in Chinese)
Felzer K R,Brodsky E E.2006.Decay of aftershock density with distance indicates triggering by dynamic stress[J].Nature,441(7094):735-738.
Gulia L,Wiemer S.2019.Real-time discrimination of earthquake foreshocks and aftershocks Decay of aftershock density with distance indicates triggering by dynamic stress[J].Nature,574(7777):193-199.
Helmstetter A,Sornette D.2003.Foreshocks explained by cascades of triggered seismicity[J].Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth,108(B10):2457.
Jones L M,Molnar P.1979.Some characteristics of foreshocks and their possible relationship to earthquake prediction and premonitory slip on faults[J].Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth,84(B7):3596-3608.
Mallman E P,Parsons T.2008.A global search for stress shadows[M].Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth,113(B12),doi:10.1029/2007JB005336.
Rundle J B,Tiampo K F,Klein W,et al.2002.Self-organization in leaky threshold systems:The influence of near-mean field dynamics and its implications for earthquakes,neurobiology,and forecasting[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,99(S1):2514-2521.
Rundle J B,Turcotte D L,Shcherbakov R,et al.2003.Statistical physics approach to understanding the multiscale dynamics of earthquake fault systems[J].Reviews of Geophysics,41(4):1019.
Sykes L R.1971.Aftershock zones of great earthquakes,seismicity gaps,and earthquake prediction for Alaska and the Aleutians[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,76(32):8021-8041.
Sykes L R.1978.Intraplate seismicity,reactivation of preexisting zones of weakness,alkaline magmatism,and other tectonism postdating continental fragmentation[J].Reviews of Geophysics,16(4):621-688.
Yu H Z,Liu J,Ma Y W,et al.2022.A possible characteristic of foreshocks derived from the evaluation of loading/unloading induced by earth tides[J].Frontiers in Earth Science,doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.967264.
Yu H Z,Liu L,Ma Y C,et al.2023.Observed hydrological changes associated with active tectonic blocks before three consecutive earthquakes in Qinghai,China[J].Scientific Reports,13(1),doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36274-2.
Yu H Z,Shen Z K,Wan Y G,et al.2006.Increasing critical sensitivity of the Load/Unload Response Ratio before large earthquakes with identified stress accumulation pattern[J].Tectonophysics,428(1-4):87-94.
Yu H Z,Yu C,Ma Z,et al.2020.Temporal and spatial evolution of Load/Unload Response Ratio before the M_S7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake of Aug.8,2017 in Sichuan Province[J].Pure and Applied Geophysics,177:321-331.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:: 收稿日期:2024-05-06.
基金项目:中国地震局震情跟踪任务(CEA-ZQGZ-202501023); 国家自然基金地震科学联合基金(U2039205).
第一作者简介:李泽平(1999-),助理工程师,主要从事地震预测理论研究.E-mail:lzp19990909@163.com.
通信作者简介:余怀忠(1975-),研究员,主要从事地震孕育机理和预测理论研究.E-mail:yuhz750216@sina.com.

更新日期/Last Update: 2025-03-10

《地震研究》[ISSN:1000-0666/CN:53-1062/P]

文章信息/Info

参考文献/References:

备注/Memo

常用功能

导航/Navigate

工具/Tools

统计/Statistics