|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]康胜军,何志堂,赵丕,等.测段数量对相对重力仪性能试验的影响分析[J].地震研究,2025,(04):693-701.[doi:10.20015/j.cnki.ISSN1000-0666.2025.0071 ]
　KANG Shengjun,HE Zhitang,ZHAO Pi,et al.Analysis of the Influence of the Number of Gravimetric Sections on the Performance Test of the Relative Gravimeter[J].Journal of Seismological Research,2025,(04):693-701.[doi:10.20015/j.cnki.ISSN1000-0666.2025.0071 ]
点击复制

测段数量对相对重力仪性能试验的影响分析(PDF/HTML)

《地震研究》[ISSN:1000-0666/CN:53-1062/P]

卷:
期数:
2025年04期
页码:
693-701
栏目:
重力场及其变化观测与地球科学应用专辑
出版日期:
2025-05-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of the Influence of the Number of Gravimetric Sections on the Performance Test of the Relative Gravimeter
作者:
康胜军1; 何志堂1; 赵丕1; 汪健2; 史志刚1
(1.自然资源部第一大地测量队,陕西 西安 710054; 2.中国地震局地震研究所地震大地测量重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071)
Author(s):
KANG Shengjun1; HE Zhitang1; ZHAO Pi1; WANG Jian2; SHI Zhigang1
(1.The First Geodetic Surveying Brigade of Ministry of Natural Resources,Xi'an 710054,Shaanxi,China)(2.Key Laboratory of Earthquake Geodesy,Institute of Seismology,China EarthquakeAdministration,Wuhan 430071,Hubei,China)
关键词:
相对重力仪;  性能试验;  动态精度;  一致性中误差;  测段数量
Keywords:
relative gravimeter;  performance test;  dynamic accuracy;  the mean square error of the consistency;  the number of gravimetric sections
分类号:
P315.62
DOI:
10.20015/j.cnki.ISSN1000-0666.2025.0071
摘要:
为了分析测段数量对相对重力仪性能试验的影响,对2021—2024年4台CG-6型和4台BURRIS型相对重力仪的性能试验数据进行处理,选取2～9段段差计算动态精度和3种仪器组合数的一致性中误差。发现CG-6型、BURRIS型相对重力仪动态精度的均值分别为(1～3)×10-8 m/s2、(4～16)×10-8 m/s2; 3台仪器组合较6台仪器组合的一致性中误差更容易满足限差。剔除读数异常的仪器干扰后进一步分析发现,测段数量与相对重力仪的性能试验结果密切相关。随着测段数量的增加,动态精度和一致性中误差结果会逐渐趋于稳定; 当测段数量为5～7段时,各台仪器的动态精度和多台仪器一致性中误差达到峰值,之后逐渐减小或保持稳定。
Abstract:
In order to analyze the influence of the number of gravimetric sections on the performance test of the relative gravimeter,the performance test data of four CG-6 and four BURRIS relative gravimeters for four consecutive years were processed,and the difference between 2 to 9 sections was selected to calculate dynamic accuracy and the mean square error of the consistency of multiple instruments of the three instrument combinations.It was found that the dynamic accuracy of CG-6 relative gravimeter changed in the range of 1×10-8 m/s2 to 3×10-8 m/s2,and the dynamic accuracy of BURRIS relative gravimeter was in the range of 4×10-8 m/s2 to 16×10-8 m/s2.The mean square error of the consistency of three instruments is more likely to accord with the limit compared to a combination of six instruments.The results of further analysis show that the number of gravimetric sections is closely related to the performance test results of the relative gravimeter after removing the abnormal instrument interference.With the increase of the number of gravimetric sections,the dynamic accuracy and the mean square error of the consistency of multiple instruments will gradually become stable.When the number of gravimetric sections is 5 to 7,the dynamic accuracy and the mean square error of the consistency of multiple instruments reaches the peak,and then the value gradually decreases or remains stable.

参考文献/References:


邓友茂,王振亮,孙诚业.2021.CG型重力仪性能对比分析[J].大地测量与地球动力学,41(4):432-435.
Deng Y M,Wang Z L,Sun C Y.2021.Comparative analysis of the CG gravimeters performance[J].Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics,41(4):432-435.(in Chinese)
韩建成,陈石,李红蕾,等.2022.陆地高精度重力观测数据的应用研究进展[J].地球与行星物理论评,53(1):17-34.
Han J C,Chen S,Li H L,et al.2022.The recent progress using high-precision terrestrial gravity measurements[J].Reviews of Geophysics and Planetary Physics,53(1):17-34.(in Chinese)
韩宇飞,何志堂,刘阳,等.2017.灵山重力标定基线场的升级改造与复测[J].测绘地理信息,42(4):69-72.
Han Y F,He Z T,Liu Y,et al.2017.Reform and repetition measurement of Lingshan gravity calibration baseline field[J].Journal of Geomatics,42(4):69-72.(in Chinese)
郝洪涛,李辉,孙和平,等.2016.CG-5重力仪零漂改正及格值系数检测应用研究[J].武汉大学学报(信息科学版),41(9):1265-1271.
Hao H T,Li H,Sun H P,et al.2016.Application of zero drift correct and detection of scale parameters of CG-5 gravimeter[J].Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University,41(9):1265-1271.(in Chinese)
胡敏章,郝洪涛,韩宇飞,等.2021.2021年青海玛多MS7.4地震的重力挠曲均衡背景与震前重力变化[J].地球物理学报,64(9):3135-3149.
Hu M Z,Hao H T,Han Y F,et al.2021.Gravity flexural isostasy background of the 2021 Maduo(Qinghai)MS7.4 earthquake and gravity change before the earthquake[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics,64(9):3135-3149.(in Chinese)
梁伟锋,刘芳,祝意青,等.2015.重力仪一次项系数对重力场动态变化的影响研究[J].大地测量与地球动力学,35(5):882-886.
Liang W F,Liu F,Zhu Y Q,et al.2015.Research on the effect of one degree term of chromatic polynomial of gravimeter on gravity dynamic change[J].Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics,35(5):882-886.(in Chinese)
隗寿春,祝意青,赵云峰,等.2019.CG-5重力仪格值系数对重力数据处理的影响[J].大地测量与地球动力学,39(2):210-214.
Wei S C,Zhu Y Q,Zhao Y F,et al.2019.Impact on gravity data process of scale factor coefficient of CG-5 gravimeter[J].Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics,39(2):210-214.(in Chinese)
邢乐林,李辉,李建国,等.2016.陆态网络绝对重力基准的建立及应用[J].测绘学报,45(5):538-543.
Xing L L,Li H,Li J G,et al.2016.Establishment of absolute gravity datum in CMONOC and its application[J].Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica,45(5):538-543.(in Chinese)
玄松柏,汪健,李杰,等.2018.新一代CG-6重力仪性能分析[J].大地测量与地球动力学,38(1):5-7.
Xuan S B,Wang J,Li J,et al.2018.Performance analysis on a new generation of the CG-6 gravimeter[J].Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics,38(1):5-7.(in Chinese)
张锐,何志堂,郭树松,等.2011.Burris重力仪性能测试[J].大地测量与地球动力学,31(6):154-158.
Zhang R,He Z T,Guo S S,et al.2011.Characteristics test of Burris gravimeter[J].Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics,31(6):154-158.(in Chinese)
张则宇,赵五小,王应建,等.2016.重力仪动态精度检定方法浅析[J].北京测绘,(6):111-114.
Zhang Z Y,Zhao W X,Wang Y J,et al.2016.Analysis of the dynamic precision verification method of gravimeter[J].Beijing Surveying and Mapping,(6):111-114.(in Chinese)
祝意青,刘芳,张国庆,等.2022.中国流动重力监测与地震预测[J].武汉大学学报(信息科学版),47(6):820-829.
Zhu Y Q,Liu F,Zhang G Q,et al.2022.Mobile gravity monitoring and earthquake prediction in China[J].Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University,47(6):820-829.(in Chinese)
DB/T 23—2007,地震观测仪器进网技术要求——重力仪[S].
DB/T 23—2007,Technical requirements of instruments in network for earthquake monitoring-Gravimeter[S].(in Chinese)
DB/T 39—2010,地震台网设计技术要求——重力观测网[S].
DB/T 39—2010,Technical specifications for design of earthquake monitoring network-Gravimetric observation network[S].(in Chinese)
DZ/T 0082—2021,区域重力调查规范[S].
DZ/T 0082—2021,The standard for regional gravity survey[S].(in Chinese)
GB/T 17944—2018,加密重力测量规范[S].
GB/T 17944—2018,Specifications for the dense gravity measurement[S].(in Chinese)
GB/T 20256—2019, 国家重力控制测量规范[S].
GB/T 20256—2019,Specifications for the gravimetry control[S].(in Chinese)
SY/T 5819—2016,陆上重力磁力勘探技术规程[S].
SY/T 5819—2016,Technical specifications for land gravity and magnetic surveys[S].(in Chinese)
Xing L,Han Y,Niu X,et al.2024.Gravity change caused by heavy rainfall detected by a gPhone gravimeter in Zhengzhou,China[J].Journal of Earth Science,35:1273-1276.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2024-10-28.
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(42374104,41604014); 陕西测绘地理信息局科技创新项目(SCK2024-02).
第一作者简介:康胜军(1981-),高级工程师,主要从事重力数据采集及分析研究工作.E-mail:13571898260@163.com.
通信作者简介:赵 丕(1986-),高级工程师,主要从事重力数据采集及分析研究工作.E-mail:583954561@qq.com.
更新日期/Last Update: 2025-05-01