|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]杨国华,张晓东,张风霜,等.昆仑山口西8.1级地震震后中国西部地壳水平位移场的变化特征*[J].地震研究,2008,(01):77-82.
 YANG Guo-hua,ZHANG Xiao-dong,ZHANG Feng-shuang,et al.The Variation Characteristics of the Crust Horizontal Displacement Field in the West of China After Kunlun Mountain MS8.1 earthquake[J].Journal of Seismological Research,2008,(01):77-82.
点击复制

昆仑山口西8.1级地震震后中国西部地壳水平位移场的变化特征*(PDF/HTML)

《地震研究》[ISSN:1000-0666/CN:53-1062/P]

卷:
期数:
2008年01期
页码:
77-82
栏目:
出版日期:
2008-01-23

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Variation Characteristics of the Crust Horizontal Displacement Field in the West of China After Kunlun Mountain MS8.1 earthquake
作者:
杨国华1张晓东2张风霜1杨 博1韩月萍1王 利1沈舞春1
(1.中国地震局第一地形变监测中心,天津 300180; 2.中国地震台网中心,北京 100036)
Author(s):
YANG Guo-hua1ZHANG Xiao-dong2ZHANG Feng-shuang1
(1.First Crustal Monitoring and Application Center,CEA,Tianjin 300180,China)(2.China Earthquake Networks Center,CEA,Beijing 100036,China)
关键词:
昆仑山口西8.1级地震 GPS 偏离位移 响应与调整 中国西部
Keywords:
Kunlun Mountain MS8.1 earthquake GPS Departure displacement response and adjustment west of China
分类号:
P315.2
DOI:
-
摘要:
利用“中国地壳运动观测网络”基本站自1998年运行以来积累的观测资料,以2001年11月昆仑山口西8.1级地震前的所有资料计算的运动结果为基本参考,分别计算了2002年相对于2001年和以后几年相对于2002年的测站累计偏离位移变化结果,据此对昆仑山口西8.1级地震震时和震后中国西部水平运动场的变动进行了观察。结果表明:① 以发震断裂为界,震时南侧的西藏地区发生了由北至东的偏离位移,数值超过10 mm,北侧的新疆地区发生了NW向的偏离位移,最大值也超过了10 mm; ② 震后(从2003年算起)左旋性质的
Abstract:
Since the basic stations of “China Crust Movement Measuring Network” run in 1998,the accumulated data are used,the calculating movement results by all data before 2001(before the Kunlun Mountain MS8.1 in November of 2001)are taken as the basic reference,we have respectively calculated the accumulated departure results of 2002 relative to 2001 and the succeeding several years relative to 2002.Based on this,the changes of the horizontal movement field in the west of China have been observed,while the Kunlun Mountain Ms8.1 earthquake occurred and after the earthquake.The results suggest:① Bounded by the seismic outbreak fault,in Tibet area of the south side,the departure displacement from north to east took place when the earthquake occurred,and the departure amount even exceeded 10mm,while in Xinjiang area of the north side,the departure displacement of the direction of NW took place,and the maximal amount also exceeded 10mm; ② After the earthquake(from 2003),the laevogyrate departure displacement increased off and on,the variation of JB51(south side of the fault)and JB30(north side of the fault),which are the closest two stations to the epicenter,reached the largest up to 2005,and the relative amount was 70mm; ③ After the earthquake,the preponderant departure displacement of Tibet area,which is to the south of the seismic outbreak fault,was eastward,while Xinjiang area,which is to the north of the seismic outbreak fault,was NNW,and the more close to the epicenter,the more large of the departure; ④ The departure displacement of JB51 and JB30,which are the closest two stations to the epicenter,apparently had an evidence of reverse motion,and there wasnt new departure in Tibet area basically,while in Xinjiang area,the departure displacement of the direction of WNN was apparently developing.Anyhow,though until now there has been more than 5 years since the earthquake occurred,the correlative evidence indicates that the ordinal adjustment of the crust horizontal deformation field probably doesnt end completely,but we also dont exclude the possibility that the movement in Tibet area slowed appreciably as a result of gestating seism before the earthquake.

参考文献/References:

-

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2007-06-22
基金项目:国家科技支撑 “强震监测预报技术研究”项目和地震科学基金课题(A07066).

更新日期/Last Update: 2008-01-23