文章摘要

文章信息/Info

Title:: Analysis on Comparison Observation Test Results of Two Different Types of Mercury Detector

作者:: 杨丽¹; 刘峰¹; 官朝康²; 张淑华²; 朱培耀¹; (1.云南省地震局,云南昆明 650224; 2.弥勒市地震局,云南弥勒 652300)

Author(s):: YANG Li¹; LIU Feng¹; GUAN Chaokang²; ZHANG Shuhua²; ZHU Peiyao¹; (1.Earthquake Administration of Yunnan Province, Kunming 650224, Yunnan, China)(2.Earthquake Administration of Mile Multiple, Mile 652300, Yunnan, China)

Keywords:: Hg observation; mercury detector; comparative analysis; co-seismic response

摘要:: 在相同观测条件下,选用弥勒弥东哨井,用ATG-6138M 型痕量汞在线自动分析仪与DFG-B型和RG-BQZ型数字化智能测汞仪进行对比观测实验,由观测数据曲线和仪器参数对比分析结果得出:ATG -6138M型痕量汞在线自动分析仪检出限、灵敏度、稳定性等较DFG-B型和RG-BQZ型数字化智能测汞仪好,ATG-6138M型痕量汞在线自动分析仪观测数据曲线有明显的日变形态,能记录到同震变化。

Abstract:: Under the same observation condition, we selected Midongshao Well in Mile and compared the observation curves recorded by ATG-6138M Trace Mercury Automatic Analyzer and DFG-B and RG-BQZ Digital Intelligent Mercury Detectors. The comparison result of observation curve and the instrument parameter showed that the detection limit, sensitivity and stability of ATG-6138M Trace Mercury Automatic Analyzer were better than that of DFG-B and RG-BQZ Digital Intelligent Mercury Detectors. The observation curve recorded by ATG-6138M Trace Mercury Automatic Analyzer had the obvious the daily variation, and could record the co-seismic variation.