地震研究

通过对2008年汶川8.0级和2010年日本9.0级两次大地震的同震响应特征进行分析,讨论了经过数字化改造后的江苏流体观测井网映震能力,对不同测点井孔映震能力出现较大差异的原因进行了探讨,结果表明:(1)江苏区域井孔水位的同震响应能力强于水温,水位同震响应有较一致的变化规律,同时与震级密切相关,水温同震响应在不同井点存在较大差异,更多的表现为缓慢的恢复变化;(2)不同构造单元的井孔同震响应能力有明显差异,苏中和苏北地区的同震响应变化弱于苏南地区,这种南强北弱的原因可能是苏中黄土覆盖层较厚的构造特征使其在捕捉应力—应变状态的微变化时较南部丘陵地带弱,南部较为复杂的地质构造在受到微小扰动后更有利于地下水状态的变化。

Through the analysis of co-seismic responses features of Wenchuan M8.0 and Japan M9.0 earthquakes,we discussed the earthquake reflecting ability of the Jiangsu Fluid Observation Well Pattern System which had been digitized reformed and the reason of the major difference of earthquake reflecting ability of well holes at different measuring points. The result indicated that:(1)The co-seismic responding ability of water level was stronger than that of water temperature in regional well holes in Jiangsu. The water-level co-seismic responses had a consistent change law,and were closely related to the magnitude. The co-seismic responses of water temperature were great different at different well points,which were manifested as a slow restorative change.(2)There was difference of co-seismic responding ability at different well holes in different tectonic units. The co-seismic response change in central and northern Jiangsu area was weaker than that in southern Jiangsu area,whose reason is the tectonic characteristics of the thicker upper loess covering layer in central Jiangsu was weaker than the hilly country in southern Jiangsu in capturing the micro-changes of stress-strain states. The relatively complicated geological structure in southern Jiangsu became more favorable to the change of underground water state by the tiny disturbance.

引言
1 区域地质构造背景和流体观测井网概况
2 水位和水温的同震响应特征
3 结论

表1 江苏省数字化水位和水温观测点基本参数<br/>Tab.1 Basic parameters of the digitalized observation points of water level and water temperature in Jiangsu Province

表1 江苏省数字化水位和水温观测点基本参数
Tab.1 Basic parameters of the digitalized observation points of water level and water temperature in Jiangsu Province

图1 江苏省水温和水位同井观测点分布图<br/>Fig.1 Distribution of digitalized observation points of water level and water temperature in the same well in Jiangsu Province

图1 江苏省水温和水位同井观测点分布图
Fig.1 Distribution of digitalized observation points of water level and water temperature in the same well in Jiangsu Province

图2 昆山21井水位长趋势变化图(a)和水温正常日波动变化图(b)<br/>Fig.2 Long-time trend change of water level(a)and normal daily fluctuation change of water temperature(b)in Kunshan 21 well

图2 昆山21井水位长趋势变化图(a)和水温正常日波动变化图(b)
Fig.2 Long-time trend change of water level(a)and normal daily fluctuation change of water temperature(b)in Kunshan 21 well

图3 汶川8.0级地震江苏水位和水温观测井网同震变化图像<br/>Fig.3 Co-seismic variations of observation well net of water level and water temperature with Wenchuan M8.0 earthquake in Jiangsu Province

图3 汶川8.0级地震江苏水位和水温观测井网同震变化图像
Fig.3 Co-seismic variations of observation well net of water level and water temperature with Wenchuan M8.0 earthquake in Jiangsu Province

表2 汶川8.0地震时水位和水温同震响应主要参数<br/>Tab.2 Major parameters of co-seismic response of water level and water temperature with Wenchuan M8.0 earthquake

表2 汶川8.0地震时水位和水温同震响应主要参数
Tab.2 Major parameters of co-seismic response of water level and water temperature with Wenchuan M8.0 earthquake

表3 日本9.0地震时水位和水温同震响应主要参数<br/>Tab.3 Major parameters of co-seismic response of water level and water temperature with Japan M9.0 earthquake

表3 日本9.0地震时水位和水温同震响应主要参数
Tab.3 Major parameters of co-seismic response of water level and water temperature with Japan M9.0 earthquake

图4 金湖06井2011年3月11日8～20时水位曲线图<br/>Fig.4 Water level curve recorded by Jinhu 06 Well from 8 am to 20 pm on Mar.11,2011

图4 金湖06井2011年3月11日8～20时水位曲线图
Fig.4 Water level curve recorded by Jinhu 06 Well from 8 am to 20 pm on Mar.11,2011

图5 日本9.0级地震震后苏02、16、18井水温整点值曲线<br/>Fig.5 Water temperature hour values curve recorded by Su 02,16 and 18 Wells after the Japan M9.0 earthquake

图5 日本9.0级地震震后苏02、16、18井水温整点值曲线
Fig.5 Water temperature hour values curve recorded by Su 02,16 and 18 Wells after the Japan M9.0 earthquake

图6 同震响应的水位和水温变化幅度关系图<br/>Fig.6 Co-seismic response range change relationship between water level and water temperature

图6 同震响应的水位和水温变化幅度关系图
Fig.6 Co-seismic response range change relationship between water level and water temperature

表4 江苏省数字化水位与水温同震响应能力统计表<br/>Tab.4 Co-seismic response abilities statistics of the digitalized

表4 江苏省数字化水位与水温同震响应能力统计表
Tab.4 Co-seismic response abilities statistics of the digitalized

车用太,赵文忠,鱼金子,等.2006.京津冀地区井水位的数字化观测及其地震前兆监测效能评估[J].地震,26(4):103-112.
陈大庆,刘耀炜.2006.我国在井一含水层系统对地震波同震响应方面的研究进展[J].国际地震动态,(7):27-31.
付虹邬成栋刘强,等.2007.印尼巨大地震引起的云南水位异常记录及其意义[J].地震地质,29(4):873-882.
高小其,陈华静,杨又陵,等.2006. 2004年12月26日印尼8.7级强震新疆地区的同震效应[J].地震地磁观测与研究,27(3):40-46.
顾申宜,李志雄,张慧.2010.2010.海南地区五口井水位对汶川地震的同震响应及其频谱分析[J].地震研究,33(1):36-43.
黄辅琼,迟恭财,徐桂明.2000.大陆地下流体对台湾南投7.6级地震的响应研究[J].地震,20(增刊):119-125.
廖丽霞,王玫玲,吴绍祖.2009.福建省流体台网井水位的同震效应及其地震预测意义[J].地震学报,31(4):432-441.
刘五洲,鱼金子,车用太,等.2003.三峡井网地下流体动态与映震能力的初步分析[J].地震地质,25(4):632-639.
王博,刘耀炜,孙小龙.2008.地下流体与断裂活动关系的研究综述[J].地震研究,31(3):296-302.
徐桂明,郑江蓉,杨从杰,等.2010.江苏05井、06井水温的中短期地震异常典型特征研究[J].地震研究,33(4):274-280.
杨竹转,邓志辉陶京玲,等.2007.北京塔院井数字化观测水温的同震效应研究[J].地震学报,29(2):203-213.
杨竹转,邓志辉,赵云旭,等.2006.云南思茅大寨井水位同震阶变的初步研究[J].地震学报,27(5):569-574.
鱼金子,车用太,刘成龙,等.2012.金沙江水网对日本9.0级地震的同震响应及其特征与机理地震[J].地震,32(1):59-69.
张永仙.1991.流量与水温关系的模型研究及地震水温前兆机制的探讨[J].中国地震,7(3):88-94.
Blanchard F B,Byerly.1935.A study of a well gauge as a seismograph[J].Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,25(1):3l3-321.
Matsumoto N.1992.Regression analysis for anomalous changes of ground water level due to eathquake.Geophys ResLett,l9(12):1193-1199.
Rexin E E,Oliver J,Prentiss D.1962.Seismically-induced fluctuation of the water level in the Nunn-Bush Well in Milwaukee[J].Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,52(1):l7-25.
Roeloffs E A.1998.Persistent water level changes in a well near Parkfield California,due to local and distant earthquakes.J Geophys Res,103(B1):869-889.

备注

引言

1 区域地质构造背景和流体观测井网概况

2 水位和水温的同震响应特征

3 结论

期刊信息