地震研究

利用远震接收函数方法得到鲁西隆起、沂沭断裂带及胶南隆起区域30个宽频带地震台站下方的地壳厚度、泊松比值。结果显示:该区域地壳厚度和泊松比呈现不均一、变化大的特征,其中泰山地区、沂沭断裂带郯城—莒县段及RZH台下方地壳厚度值小、泊松比值高。经分析认为,鲁西隆起地壳厚度薄、泊松比值高的区域与底部地幔物质上涌及热侵蚀作用相关; 沂沭断裂带地壳厚度和泊松比具有明显分段的特征,体现在断裂带郯城—莒县段地壳厚度薄、泊松比高; 莒县—安丘段与断裂两侧的地壳厚度、泊松比值相近,说明其壳幔相互作用主要体现在郯城—莒县段; 胶南隆起地区仅RZH台站下方地壳厚度值低、泊松比值高,结合该区域重力异常梯度带特征,推测大型的北北东向断裂带可能是造成RZH台站下方低地壳厚度值和高泊松比值的原因。

We obtained the crustal thickness and Poisson's ratio beneath 30 seismic stations in the area of Luxi Uplift, Yishu Fault and Jiaonan Uplift by tele-seismic receiver function method. The results showed that the heterogeneity of crustal thickness and Poisson's ratio was obvious in the study area, and the crustal thickness value was low and the Poisson's ratio was high beneath Taishan area, Tancheng-Juxian section of Yishu Fault and RZH Station. We analyzed the obtained result and found that the area of thin crustal thickness and high Poisson's ratio beneath the Luxi Uplift was related with the mantle upwelling and thermal erosion in the bottom of Taishan area. The crustal thickness and Poisson's ratio of Yishu Fault had obvious segmentation features, which was the crustal thickness was thin and Poisson's ratio was high at Tancheng-Juxian section of Yishu Fault.The value of the crustal thickness and Poisson's ratio at Juxian-Anqiu section was closer to that of in both sides of Yishu Fault,which was indicated that the interaction of crust and mantle mainly occurs at the Tancheng-Juxian section. The low crustal thickness and high Poisson's ratio only exited beneath RZH Station of Jiaonan Uplift area, we induced that it may be caused by the NNE-trending fault combined with the gradient zone of gravity anomaly of Jiaonan Uplift area.

引言
1 地质构造概况
2 计算方法与结果
3 地壳厚度、泊松比分析与讨论
4 结论

图1 鲁西隆起、沂沭断裂带及胶南隆起区域地质简图<br/>Fig.1 Geological sketch map of the area of Luxi Uplift,Yishu Fault and Jiaonan Uplift

图1 鲁西隆起、沂沭断裂带及胶南隆起区域地质简图
Fig.1 Geological sketch map of the area of Luxi Uplift,Yishu Fault and Jiaonan Uplift

表1 各地震台站下方地壳厚度、泊松比计算结果<br/>Tab.1 The calculation results of crustal thicknesses and Poisson's ratio beneath seismic stations

表1 各地震台站下方地壳厚度、泊松比计算结果
Tab.1 The calculation results of crustal thicknesses and Poisson's ratio beneath seismic stations

图2 台站分布(a)及远震(MS>6.0,震中距30°～90°)震中分布(b)图<br/>Fig.2 The distribution map of stations(a)and epicentres of teleseismic(MS>6.0,epicentral distances of 30°～90°)(b)

图2 台站分布(a)及远震(MS>6.0,震中距30°～90°)震中分布(b)图
Fig.2 The distribution map of stations(a)and epicentres of teleseismic(MS>6.0,epicentral distances of 30°～90°)(b)

图3 QXT(a)、TIA(b)、ZCH(c)、JUX(d)、TCH(e)、XIT(f)、RZH(g)、WUL(h)地震台站的接收函数<br/>Fig.3 Receiver functions of QXT(a),TIA(b),ZCH(c),JUX(d),TCH(e),XIT(f),RZH(g)and WUL(h)stations

图3 QXT(a)、TIA(b)、ZCH(c)、JUX(d)、TCH(e)、XIT(f)、RZH(g)、WUL(h)地震台站的接收函数
Fig.3 Receiver functions of QXT(a),TIA(b),ZCH(c),JUX(d),TCH(e),XIT(f),RZH(g)and WUL(h)stations

图4 QXT(a)、TIA(b)、ZCH(c)、JUX(d)、TCH(e)、XIT(f)、RZH(g)、WUL(h)地震台站H-κ叠加的结果<br/>Fig.4 The H-κ stack results of QXT(a),TIA(b),ZCH(c),JUX(d),TCH(e),XIT(f),RZH(g)and WUL(h)stations

图4 QXT(a)、TIA(b)、ZCH(c)、JUX(d)、TCH(e)、XIT(f)、RZH(g)、WUL(h)地震台站H-κ叠加的结果
Fig.4 The H-κ stack results of QXT(a),TIA(b),ZCH(c),JUX(d),TCH(e),XIT(f),RZH(g)and WUL(h)stations

图5 鲁西隆起、沂沭断裂带及胶南隆起区域地区地壳厚度(a)、泊松比(b)分布图<br/>Fig.5 The distribution map of crustal thicknesses(a)and Poisson's ratio(b)beneath the area of Luxi Uplift,Yishu Fault and Jiaonan Uplift

图5 鲁西隆起、沂沭断裂带及胶南隆起区域地区地壳厚度(a)、泊松比(b)分布图
Fig.5 The distribution map of crustal thicknesses(a)and Poisson's ratio(b)beneath the area of Luxi Uplift,Yishu Fault and Jiaonan Uplift

图6 泰山地区南北向地壳结构剖面示意图<br/>Fig.6 Sketch map of crustal structure in NS of Taishan area

图6 泰山地区南北向地壳结构剖面示意图
Fig.6 Sketch map of crustal structure in NS of Taishan area

图7 沂沭断裂带速度结构图(苏道磊,2015)(a)剖面位置图;(b)速度结构图
Fig.7 Velocity structure of Yishu Fault(Su,2015)(a)the location of the profile;(b)the image of velocity structure

图8 山东地区重力异常图(刘前志等,1997)<br/>Fig.8 The map of characteristics of gravity anomaly in Shandong area(Liu et al,1997)

图8 山东地区重力异常图(刘前志等,1997)
Fig.8 The map of characteristics of gravity anomaly in Shandong area(Liu et al,1997)

曹洋. 2009.郯庐断裂带山东段晚中生代火山岩地球化学特征及其地质意义[D].合肥:合肥工业大学,54-55.
查小惠,雷建设.2013.云南地区地壳厚度和泊松比研究[J].中国科学:地球科学,43(3):446-456.
邓晋福,莫宣学,赵海玲等.1994.中国东部岩石圈根/去根作用与大陆“活化”——东亚型大陆动力学研究计划[J].现代地质,8(3):349-356.
葛粲,郑勇,熊熊.2011.华北地区地壳厚度与泊松比研究[J].地球物理学报,54(10):2538-2548.
黄海波,丘学林,夏少红.2012.海南岛地壳厚度与泊松比结构[J].热带海洋学报,31(3):65-70.
嵇少丞,王茜,杨文才.2009.华北克拉通泊松比与地壳厚度的关系及其大地构造意义[J].地质学报,83(3):324-331.
李万程. 1998.煤田构造样式分析步骤——兼论鲁西区构造变形[J].中国煤田地质, 3(1):1-9.
刘昌铨,祝治平,李捍东等.1983.连云港—临沂—泗水测深剖面及临沂8.5级地震深部构造背景[J].地震,(3):11-17.
刘前志,冯杏芝,张洁等.1997.郯庐断裂带地球物理场特征、地质演化及对油气的控制[J].石油地球物理勘探,32(增刊2):1-10.
牛漫兰,朱光,宋传中等.2000.郯庐断裂带火山活动与深部地质过程的新认识[J].地质科技情报,19(3):21-26.
牛树银,胡华斌,毛景文等.2004.鲁西地区地质构造特征及其形成机制[J].中国区域地质, 31(1):34-39.
时秀朋,李理.2007.鲁西隆起晚中生代以来伸展构造物理模拟[J].新疆石油地质,28(4):490-493.
苏道磊.2015.沂沭断裂带及邻近地地壳三维速度结构及地震活动性[D].北京:中国科学院大学,1-105.
王桂梁,燕守勋,姜波.1992.鲁西中新生代复合伸展构造系统[J].中国矿业大学学报,21(3):1-8.
王涛,郑亚东,张进江等.2007.华北克拉通中生代伸展构造研究的几个问题及其在岩石圈减薄研究中的意义[J].地质通报,26(9):1154-1166.
魏梦华,史志宏,殷秀华等.1980.根据重力资料分析华北地区地壳结构的基本形态及其与地震的关系[J].地震地质,2(2):55-60.
吴福元,孙德有.1999.中国东部中生代岩浆作用与岩石圈减薄[J].长春科技大学学报,29(4):313-318.
燕守勋.1994.从盆底沉积和古构造分析鲁西中生代地壳展史[J].中国区域地质,(1):46-51.
张宝政,李双林.2007.鲁西裂谷系的地质特征及演化[J].长春地质学院学报,20(3):287-295.
张碧秀,汤永安.1988.沂沭断裂带地壳结构特征[J].中国地震,4(3):16-22.
张自恒.1995.鲁西伸展构造[J].山东地质, 11(2):24-31.
Christensen N I. 1996. Poisson's ratio and crustal seismology[J]. J Geophys Res, 101(B2): 3139-3156.
Langston C A. 1977. The effect of planar dipping structure on source and receiver responses for constant ray parameter[J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 67(4): 1029-1050.
Owens T J, Zandt G. 1997. Implications of crustal property variations for models of Tibetan plateau evolution[J]. Nature, 387(6628): 37-43.
Owens T J, Zandt G, Talor S R. 1984. Seismic evidence for an ancient rift beneath the Cumberland Plateau, Tennessee: a detailed analysis of broadband teleseismic P waveforms[J]. J Geophys Res, 89(Nb9): 7783-7795.

备注

引言

1 地质构造概况

2 计算方法与结果

3 地壳厚度、泊松比分析与讨论

4 结论

期刊信息