地震研究

夏垫断裂是北京平原区内1条极为重要的隐伏活动断裂,同时也是1679年三河—平谷MS8.0地震的发震断层。为获取该断裂完整的古地震序列,主要开展了2方面工作:①以大胡庄探槽原始资料为基础,重新对探槽进行了解译,共识别出3个埋藏古土壤,6个崩积楔和1次砂土液化现象; ②结合该断裂其它部位探槽揭示的古地震事件,通过对比各探槽标志性地层,建立不同探槽中古地震事件在同一时间轴上的联系,得到夏垫断裂完整的古地震序列。结果表明:距今31 ka以来,夏垫断裂共发生过11次古地震事件,古地震平均复发间隔约为2.8 ka,但距今25～15 ka存在1个古地震丛集期,丛集期内共发生5次强震,平均复发间隔约为2.0 ka,反映出夏垫断裂活动性存在阶段性的差异。

The Xiadian fault is an important buried active fault located in the Beijing plain. It is also the seismogenic fault of the Sanhe-Pinggu MS8.0 earthquake occurred in 1679. In order to obtain the complete paleoseismic sequence of the fault,the following two aspects are carried out. First,we reinterpret the Dahuzhuang trench based on the origin trench datum and reveal three paleosol,six collapse wedges and one sand liquefaction. Second,combined with the events revealed by the trenches in other parts of the fault,we established the relationship between the seismic events of different trenches at the same time axis. Then,we get intact paleoseismic sequence of the Xiadian fault. The results show that the Xiadian fault has occurred 11 paleoseismic events(including the 1679 earthquake)since 31 ka and the average recurrence interval of earthquake was 2.82 ka. Meanwhile,there were five strong earthquakes from 25 ka to 15 ka and the average recurrence interval was 2 ka. It reflects that the activity of the Xiadian fault exists differences at different stages.

引言
1 活动构造背景
2 大胡庄探槽揭露的古地震事件
3 讨论
4 结论

图1 北京平原区地震构造图与夏垫断裂陡坎分布<br/>Fig.1 Seismotectonic map of the Beijing plain and fault scarp distribution of the Xiadian Fault

图1 北京平原区地震构造图与夏垫断裂陡坎分布
Fig.1 Seismotectonic map of the Beijing plain and fault scarp distribution of the Xiadian Fault

图2 大胡庄探槽位置图<br/>Fig.2 Location of the Dahuzhuang trench

图2 大胡庄探槽位置图
Fig.2 Location of the Dahuzhuang trench

图3 上部探槽照片(a)及综合解释图(b)<br/>Fig.3 Picture of the upper trench(a)and comprehensive interpretation diagram(b)

图3 上部探槽照片(a)及综合解释图(b)
Fig.3 Picture of the upper trench(a)and comprehensive interpretation diagram(b)

图4 下部探槽照片(a)及综合解释图(b)<br/>Fig.4 Picture of the lower trench(a)and comprehensive interpretation diagram(b)

图4 下部探槽照片(a)及综合解释图(b)
Fig.4 Picture of the lower trench(a)and comprehensive interpretation diagram(b)

图5 崩积楔(a-f)与砂土液化(g)局部放大图<br/>Fig.5 Zoom-in pictures of collapse wedge(a-f)and sand liquefaction(g)

图5 崩积楔(a-f)与砂土液化(g)局部放大图
Fig.5 Zoom-in pictures of collapse wedge(a-f)and sand liquefaction(g)

表1 大胡庄探槽古地震事件基本参数<br/>Tab.1 Paleo-earthquake main parameters from the Dahuzhuang trench

表1 大胡庄探槽古地震事件基本参数
Tab.1 Paleo-earthquake main parameters from the Dahuzhuang trench

图6 大胡庄地形剖面图
Fig.6 Topography profile of Dahuzhuang

表2 各探槽标志层层位对比<br/>Tab.2 Comparison of symbol layer in each trench

表2 各探槽标志层层位对比
Tab.2 Comparison of symbol layer in each trench

图7 夏垫断裂不同部位探槽揭示古地震对比<br/>Fig.7 Comparison of paleoseismicity at different zone of the Xiadian fault

图7 夏垫断裂不同部位探槽揭示古地震对比
Fig.7 Comparison of paleoseismicity at different zone of the Xiadian fault

何宏林,闵伟,原口强.2008.1679年三河—平谷8级地震破裂带的大地切片实验研究[J].地震地质,30(1):289-297.
江娃利,侯治华,肖振敏,等.2000.北京平原区夏垫断裂齐心庄探槽古地震事件分析[J].地震地质,22(4):413-422.
梁灵君,杨忠山,白国营.2011.基于GIS的北京市平原区流域水系划分方法探讨[J].北京水务,(6):4-6.
刘保金,胡平,孟勇奇,等.2009.北京地区地壳精细结构的深地震反射剖面探测研究[J].地球物理学报,52(9):2264-2272.
刘保金,张先康,陈颙,等.2011.三河—平谷8.0级地震区地壳结构和活动断裂研究——利用单次覆盖深反射和浅层地震剖面[J].地球物理学报,54(5):1251-1259.
刘智荣,沈军,黄静宜,等.2016.河北三河晚更新世地层粒度特征分析[J].地质学报,90(5):997-1005.
毛昌伟,丁锐,龚正,等.2010.1679年三河—平谷8级地震地表断层陡坎的GPS测量[C]//地壳构造与地壳应力文集,11-18.
孟宪梁,杜春涛,王瑞,等.1983.1679年三河—平谷大震的地震断裂带[J].地震,(3):18-23.
彭一民,李鼎容,谢振钊,等.1981.北京平原区同生断裂的某些特征及其研究意义[J].地震地质,3(2):57-64.
冉勇康,邓起东,杨晓平,等.1997.1679年三河—平谷8级地震发震断层的古地震及其重复间隔[J].地震地质,19(3):193-201.
冉勇康,李彦宝,杜鹏,等.2014.中国大陆古地震研究的关键技术与案例解析(3)——正断层破裂特征、环境影响与古地震识别[J].地震地质,36(2):287-301.
万永魁,沈军,于晓辉,等.2014.北京平原区夏垫活动断裂滑动速率及古地震复发间隔[J].防灾科技学院学报,16(3):38-45.
向宏发,方仲景,徐杰,等.1988.三河—平谷8级地震区的构造背景与大震重复性研究[J].地震地质,10(1):15-28.
向宏发,方仲景,张晚霞,等.1993.北京平原区隐伏断裂晚第四纪活动性的初步研究[J].地震学报,15(3):385-388.
徐倩华.2010.北京平原区第四纪地层与新构造运动[D].北京:中国地质大学.
徐锡伟,计凤桔,于贵华,等.2000.用钻孔地层剖面记录恢复古地震序列:河北夏垫断裂古地震研究[J].地震地质,22(1):9-19.
杨晓平,曹景虎,陈献程.2012.夏垫活动断裂两盘岩心氧化铁变化[J].地震地质,34(4):659-671.
张超,沈军,赵江涛,等.2014.北京平原夏垫断裂沉积旋回研究[J].防灾科技学院学报,16(2):49-57.
张培震,闵伟,邓起东,等.2003.海源活动断裂带的古地震与强震复发规律[J].中国科学:地球科学,33(8):705-714.
赵忠海.2009.北京平原区新构造活动及其引发的不良地质现象分析[J].资源环境与工程,23(3):282-286.
Xu L Q,Li S Z,Cao X Z,et al.2016.Holocene Intracontinental Deformation of the Northern North China Plain:Evidence of Tectonic Ground Fissures[J].Journal of Asian Earth Science,119(9):49-64.

备注

引言

1 活动构造背景

2 大胡庄探槽揭露的古地震事件

3 讨论

4 结论

期刊信息