|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]李其栋,谢卓娟.基于接收函数方法研究广东地区地壳厚度与泊松比[J].地震研究,2024,47(02):212-222.[doi:10.20015/j.cnki.ISSN1000-0666.2024.0020]
 LI Qidong,XIE Zhuojuan.Study of the Crustal Thickness and Poisson’s Ratio in Guangdong with Receiver Function Method[J].Journal of Seismological Research,2024,47(02):212-222.[doi:10.20015/j.cnki.ISSN1000-0666.2024.0020]
点击复制

基于接收函数方法研究广东地区地壳厚度与泊松比(PDF/HTML)

《地震研究》[ISSN:1000-0666/CN:53-1062/P]

卷:
47
期数:
2024年02期
页码:
212-222
栏目:
出版日期:
2024-06-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study of the Crustal Thickness and Poisson’s Ratio in Guangdong with Receiver Function Method
作者:
李其栋12谢卓娟12
(1.应急管理部国家自然灾害防治研究院,北京 100085; 2.复合链生自然灾害动力学应急管理部重点实验室,北京 100085)
Author(s):
LI Qidong12XIE Zhuojuan12
(1.National Institute of Natural Hazards,Ministry of Emergency Management of China,Beijing 100085,China)(2.Key Laboratory of Compound and Chained Natural Hazards Dynamics,Ministry of Emergency Management of China,Beijing 100085,China)
关键词:
广东地区 接收函数 地壳厚度 泊松比
Keywords:
well Han 1 water temperature continous variation oil and gas abnormal mechanism Tianjin
分类号:
P313
DOI:
10.20015/j.cnki.ISSN1000-0666.2024.0020
摘要:
选取广东地区49个固定地震台站记录到的远震资料,采用时间域迭代反褶积法提取P波接收函数,利用Н-к叠加法获得台站下方的地壳厚度与泊松比。结果表明:①广东地区地壳厚度在24.8~31.0 km,平均值为28.3 km,自西北往东南减薄,呈区域性带状分布特征,可能与研究区内山脉隆起、平原和山地相间的地质构造相关。②研究区泊松比为0.220~0.287,平均值为0.244,泊松比北部偏高、南部偏低,沿海地区高于内陆地区,具有区域性块状分布特征,可能与地壳主要深大断裂切割的地质块体有关。③地壳厚度和泊松比分布与断裂的分布有较好的对应关系,并在断裂附近变化明显。④地壳厚度与泊松比呈负相关,可能与古太平洋板块在地壳演化过程中向广东大陆方向推进,幔源物质进入地壳,在地壳深部存在部分熔融,从而导致地壳岩石中镁铁成分含量上升引起的泊松比升高有关。
Abstract:
The teleseismic data recorded at 49 seismic stations in Guangdong were selected,and the P-wave receiver function was extracted using the iterative deconvolution method in the time domain.The crustal thickness and Poisson’s ratio below the stations were obtained by the Н-к superposition method.The results show that:①In Guangdong region,the crustal thickness ranges from 24.8 to 31.0 km,with an average of 28.3 km,and becomes thinner and thinner from northwest to southeast,showing a regional zonal distribution.This may be related to the geological structure of the uplifted mountains,plains and high land in the study area.②In Guangdong region,Poisson’s ratio ranges from 0.220 to 0.287,with a mean value of 0.244.Poisson’s ratio is higher in the north and lower in the south,and is higher in coastal areas than inland areas; Poisson’s ratio distributes in regional blocks.This may be related to the geological blocks cut by deep major faults in the Crust.③The distribution of the Crustal thickness and Poisson’s ratio correspond well with the distribution of the faults and they vary significantly near the faults.④The Crustal thickness and Poisson’s ratio are negatively correlated,because during the evolution of the Crust,the ancient Pacific plate extruded toward the Guangdong continent,then the mantle-sourced materials got into the Crust,and partially melted in the deep Crust.This led to the increase of the contents of magnesium and iron in the rocks,thus causing the increase of Poisson’s ratio.

参考文献/References:


安张辉,周民都,吴庆举,等.2004.接收函数方法研究进展[J].西北地震学报,26(4):362-365.
An Z H,Zhou M D,Wu Q J,et al.2004.Progress in the study of receiver function methods[J].Northwestern Seismological Journal,26(4):362-365.(in Chinese)
蔡学林,朱介寿,曹家敏,等.2003.华南地区岩石圈三维结构类型与演化动力学[J].大地构造与成矿学,27(4):301-312.
Cai X L,Zhu J S,Cao J M,et al.2003.Three-dimensional structural types and evolutionary dynamics of the lithosphere in South China[J].Geotectonica et Metallogenyia,27(4):301-312.(in Chinese)
黄海波,郭兴伟,夏少红,等.2014.华南沿海地区地壳厚度与泊松比研究[J].地球物理学报,57(12):3896-3906.
Huang H B,Guo X W,Xia S H,et al.2014.Study on crustal thickness and Poisson’s ratio in coastal areas of South China[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics,57(12):3896-3906.(in Chinese)
嵇少丞,王茜,杨文采,等.2009.华北克拉通泊松比与地壳厚度的关系及其大地构造意义[J].地质学报,83(3):324-330.
Ji S C,Wang X,Yang W C,et al.2009.Relationship between Poisson’s ratio and crustal thickness in the North China Craton and its geotectonic significance[J].Acta Geologica Sinica,83(3):324-330.
李海艳,蔡辉腾,金星,等.2021.利用远震P波接收函数研究中国福建地区地壳厚度与泊松比[J].地球物理学报,64(3):805-822.
Li H Y,Cai H T,JinX,et al.2021.Study of crustal thickness and Poisson’s ratio in Fujian,China,using the teleseismic P-wave reception function[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics,64(3):805-822.(in Chinese)
沈玉松,康英,徐果明.2013.广东及其邻域的地壳厚度和泊松比分布[J].中国地震,29(2):210-218.
Shen Y S,Kang Y,Xu G M.2013.Crustal thickness and Poisson’s ratio distribution in Guangdong and its neighboring areas[J].Earthquake Research in China,29(2):210-218.(in Chinese)
孙丽,刘瑞丰,黄志斌,等.2008.用接收函数研究川滇地区国家地震台下地壳厚度及波速比[J].中国地震,24(4):362-369.
Sun L,Liu R F,Huang Z B,et al.2008.Study of crustal thickness and wave velocity ratio under national seismic stations in Sichuan and Yunnan regions using reception functions[J].Earthquake Research in China,24(4):362-369.(in Chinese)
王雅迪,于津海,李晓玲,等.2021.扬子地块与华夏地块的西段界限:来自桂北和桂东新元古界—寒武系沉积岩的证据[J].地质学报,95(6):1712-1726.
Wang Y D,Yu J H,Li X L,et al.2021.Western boundary of the Yangzi Massif and the Huaxia Massif:Evidence from Neogene—Cambrian sedimentary rocks in northern and eastern Guizhou[J].Chinese Journal of Geology,95(6):1712-1726.(in Chinese)
魏柏林,冯绚敏,陈定国,等.2001.东南沿海地震活动特征[M].北京:地震出版社.
Wei B L,Feng X M,Chen D G,et al.2001.Characteristics of seismic activity along the southeast coast[M].Beijing:Seismological Press.(in Chinese)
吴庆举,李永华,张瑞青,等.2007a.接收函数的克希霍夫2D偏移方法[J].地球物理学报,50(2):539-545.
Wu Q J,Li Y H,Zhang R Q,et al.2007a.The Kirschhoff 2D offset method for the receiver function[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics,50(2):539-545.(in Chinese)
吴庆举,李永华,张瑞青,等.2007b.用多道反褶积方法测定台站接收函数[J].地球物理学报,50(3):791-796.
Wu Q J,Li Y H,Zhang R Q,et al.2007b.Determination of station reception functions by multi-channel inverse fold method[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics,50(3):791-796.(in Chinese)
吴庆举,田小波,张乃铃,等.2003.用Wiener滤波方法提取台站接收函数[J].中国地震,19(1):41-47.
Wu Q J,Tian X B,Zhang N L,et al.2003.Extraction of station reception functions by Wiener filtering method[J].Earthquake Research China,19(1):41-47.(in Chinese)
吴庆举,曾融生,赵文津.2004.喜马拉雅—青藏高原的上地幔倾斜构造与陆—陆碰撞过程[J].中国科学:地球科学,34(10):919-925.
Wu Q J,Zeng R S,Zhao W J.2004.Upper mantle tilting tectonics and land-land collision processes in the Himalayan-Tibetan Plateau[J].Science China:Earth Sciences,34(10):919-925.(in Chinese)
夏少红,丘学林,赵明辉,等.2010.南海北部海陆过渡带地壳平均速度及莫霍面深度分析[J].热带海洋学报,29(4):63-70.
Xia S H,Qiu X L,Zhao M H,et al.2010.Analysis of mean crustal velocities and Moho surface depths in the sea-land transition zone of the northern South China Sea[J].Journal of Tropical Oceanography,29(4):63-70.(in Chinese)
熊邵柏,金东敏,孙克忠,等.1991.福建漳州地热田及其邻近地区的地壳深部构造特征[J].地球物理学报,34(1):55-63.
Xiong S B,Jin D M,Sun K Z,et al.1991.Deep tectonic features of the crust in the Zhangzhou geothermal field and its adjacent areas in Fujian[J].Chinese Journal of Geophysics,34(1):55-63.(in Chinese)
许卫卫,郑天愉,赵亮.2011.华北地区410km间断面和660km间断面结构——克拉通活化的地幔动力学状态探测[J].中国科学:地球科学,41(5):678-685.
Xu W W,Zheng T Y,Zhao L.2011.Mantle dynamical state detection of 410 km intermittent surface and 660 km intermittent surface structure:Kraton activation in North China[J].Science China:Earth Sciences,41(5):678-685.(in Chinese)
杨中书,崇加军,倪四道,等.2010.利用远震下方接收函数研究江西省地震台站莫霍面深度及泊松比分布[J].华南地震,30(1):47-55.
Yang Z S,Chong J J,Ni S D,et al.2010.Study of Moho surface depth and Poisson’s ratio distribution at seismic stations in Jiangxi Province using the reception function below the far seismic[J].South China Journal of Seismology,30(1):47-55.(in Chinese)
袁丽文,郑斯华.2009.用远震接收函数反演福建地区宽频带台站下方莫霍界面深度[J].华南地震,29(3):85-97.
Yuan L W,Zheng S H.2009.Inversion of Moho interface depth below broadband stations in Fujian area using teleseismic reception function[J].South China Journal of Seismology,29(3):85-97.(in Chinese)
赵明辉,丘学林,徐辉龙,等.2007.南海北部沉积层和地壳内低速层的分布和识别[J].自然科学进展,17(4):471-479.
Zhao M H,Qiu X L,Xu H L,et al.2007.Distribution and identification of sedimentary layers and low-velocity layers within the crust in the northern South China Sea[J].Advances in Natural Sciences,17(4):471-479.(in Chinese)
赵延娜,段永红,魏运浩,等.2017.华南大陆东部赣闽地区地壳厚度与泊松比研究[J].大地测量与地球动力学,37(3):261-266.
Zhao Y N,Duan Y H,Wei Y H,et al.2017.Study of crustal thickness and Poisson’s ratio in the Gan and Min region,eastern mainland China[J].Geodesy and Geodynamics,37(3):261-266.(in Chinese)
郑圻森,朱介寿,宣瑞卿,等.2003.华南地区地壳速度结构分析[J].沉积与特提斯地质,23(4):9-13.
Zheng Q S,Zhu J S,Xuan R Q,et al.2003.Analysis of crustal velocity structure in South China[J].Sedimentary Geology and Tethys Geology,23(4):9-13.(in Chinese)
邹最红,陈晓非.2003.利用SV分量接收函数反演地壳横波速度结构[J].地震学报,25(1):15-23.
Zou Z H,Chen X F.2003.Inversion of crustal transverse velocity structure using SV component receiver function[J].Acta Seismological Sinica,25(1):15-23.(in Chinese)
Ammon C J,Randall G E,Zandt G.1990.On the non-uniqueness of receiver function inversions[J].Journal of Geophysic Research Atmospheres,95(B10):303-315.
Johnson R W.2001.An introduction to the Bootstrap[J].Teaching Statistics,23(2):49-54.
Langston C A.1979.Structure under Mount Rainier,Washington,inferred from teleseismic body waves[J].Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth,84(B9):4749-4762.
Yuan X,Kind R,Mechie J,et al.1997.Lithospheric and upper mantle structure of southern Tibet form a seismological passive source experiment[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,102(B12):27491-27500.
Zandt G,Ammon C J.1995.Continental crust composition constrained by measurements of crustal Poisson’s ratio[J].Nature,374(6518):152-154.
Zhu L P,Kanamori H.2000.Moho depth variation in southern California from teleseismic receiver functions[J].Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth,105(B2):2969-2980.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2022-08-30.
基金项目:中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务专项(ZDJ2021-12).
第一作者简介:李其栋(1999-),硕士研究生在读,主要从事地震学研究.E-mail:2659404332@qq.com.
通信作者简介:谢卓娟(1984-),副研究员,主要从事地震活动性分析、地震危险性分析、地震区划方法和应用研究.E-mail:xiezhuojuan@sohu.com.
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-03-20