|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]毕熙荣,冀 昆,宗成才,等.工程抗震韧性定量评估方法研究进展综述*[J].地震研究,2020,43(03):417-430.
 BI Xirong,JI Kun,ZONG Chengcai,et al.Review on Advances in Quantitative Evaluation Methods for Engineering Seismic Resilience[J].Journal of Seismological Research,2020,43(03):417-430.
点击复制

工程抗震韧性定量评估方法研究进展综述*(PDF/HTML)

《地震研究》[ISSN:1000-0666/CN:53-1062/P]

卷:
43
期数:
2020年03期
页码:
417-430
栏目:
出版日期:
2020-09-14

文章信息/Info

Title:
Review on Advances in Quantitative Evaluation Methods for Engineering Seismic Resilience
作者:
毕熙荣 12冀 昆1宗成才1任叶飞1温瑞智 1
(1.中国地震局工程力学研究所 中国地震局地震工程与工程振动重点实验室,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150080; 2.广西壮族自治区地震局,广西 南宁 530022)
Author(s):
BI Xirong 12JI Kun1ZONG Chengcai1REN Yefei1WEN Ruizhi1
(1.Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration,Institute of Engineering Mechanics,China Earthquake Administration,Harbin 150080,Heilongjiang,China)(2.Earthquake Agency of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region,Nanning 530022,Guangxi,China)
关键词:
韧性城乡 韧性量化评估 工程韧性 灾后恢复 韧性评价
Keywords:
Urban and Rural Resilience quantitative evaluation of resilience engineering resilience post-disaster recovery resilience evaluation
分类号:
TU352
DOI:
-
摘要:
“韧性城乡”已成为我国防灾减灾领域的研究热点和未来指导方向,韧性定量评估方法是保证其落地和应用的重要基础。首先结合国内外不同工程领域下的抗震韧性研究进展,梳理总结了韧性评价的7个要素:鲁棒性、可靠性、快速性、恢复时长、恢复程度、恢复策略和级联效应; 再将现有的韧性定量评估方法按照是否考虑不确定性分为两类,每种方法还可根据是否考虑时间的影响分为静态和动态性能评估方法; 进而将现有的国内外面向不同工程对象的韧性量化评估方法进行了系统地分类和评价,指出了各类评估方法的优缺点及适用范围。建议结合目前已经较为成熟的易损性、耐久性、地震风险区划的研究成果、系统特点和行为,因地制宜地改进评估方法在具体工程中的应用。
Abstract:
“Urban and Rural Resilience” has become a research hotspot and future direction in the field of disaster prevention and mitigation in China.The research on the quantitative assessment model of resilience is an important fundamental work to ensure its application.Firstly,according to the related research progress in different engineering fields,this paper summarizes seven factors of resilience evaluation:robustness,reliability,rapidity,recovery time,recovery degree,recovery strategy and cascade effect.Then,the existing resilience quantitative evaluation methods were divided into two categories by whether or not to consider the uncertainty.Each measurement method can be divided into static and dynamic performance-based method according to whether or not to consider the impact of recovery time.The existing quantitative assessment methods are systematically reviewed considering the advantages/disadvantages and their application scope.It is suggested to speed up the application of resilience based on the existing mature research results of vulnerability,durability and seismic risk zoning.

参考文献/References:

-

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2020-02-06
基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC1500801)、国家自然科学基金(51908518、51778589)、中国地震局工程力学研究所所长基金(2019B09)、 重点研发项目省级资金资助项目(GX18C011)和山东省高校土木结构防灾减灾协同创新中心基金(XTZ201901)联合资助.
通讯作者:温瑞智(1968-),研究员,博士生导师.主要从事工程地震与强震动观测技术研究E-mail:ruizhi@iem.ac.cn

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-09-18