|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]许亚吉,庞卫东.烈度速报子系统在2021年云南漾濞MS6.4地震中的应用[J].地震研究,2021,44(03):407-413.
　XU Yaji,PANG Weidong.Application of the Rapid Intensity Reporting Subsystem to the 2021 Yangbi,Yunnan MS6.4 Earthquake[J].Journal of Seismological Research,2021,44(03):407-413.
点击复制

烈度速报子系统在2021年云南漾濞MS6.4地震中的应用(PDF/HTML)

《地震研究》[ISSN:1000-0666/CN:53-1062/P]

卷:
44
期数:
2021年03期
页码:
407-413
栏目:
出版日期:
2021-10-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Application of the Rapid Intensity Reporting Subsystem to the 2021 Yangbi,Yunnan MS6.4 Earthquake
作者:
许亚吉; 庞卫东
(云南省地震局,云南 昆明 650224)
Author(s):
XU Yaji; PANG Weidong
(Yunnan Earthquake Agency,Kunming 650224,Yunnan,China)
关键词:
漾濞MS6.4地震;  烈度速报子系统;  仪器烈度
Keywords:
the Yangbi MS6.4 earthquake;  the Rapid Intensity Reporting Subsystem;  instrumental intensity
分类号:
P315.6
DOI:
-
摘要:
介绍了烈度速报子系统的产品产出流程、云南地区台站接入情况、仪器烈度算法,并以云南漾濞MS6.4地震为例,从烈度速报子系统的输入数据、产出情况、仪器烈度与宏观调查烈度的对比介绍该系统的应用情况。该系统产出的震中附近仪器烈度与宏观调查烈度在空间走向上基本吻合,二者在Ⅵ～Ⅷ度区仪器烈度与宏观调查有一定程度的对应,但各烈度区涉及的分布范围有所不同,仪器烈度能较为客观地反映震区灾害情况。
Abstract:
In this paper,we firstly introduced the Rapid Intensity Reporting Subsystem about its products output process,linked-up stations and algorithm of the instrumental intensity.Then we described the subsystem about its data input,intensity output,and the comparison between the instrumental intensity and the macroscopic intensity when the subsystem is used to handle the MS6.4 earthquake.We found that the spatial trend of the instrumental intensity was roughly consistent with the macroscopic intensity in the vicinity of the epicenter.The instrumental intensity and the macroscopic intensity in Ⅵ-Ⅷ areas to some extent corresponded to each other.In general,the instrumental intensity objectively reflected the damage in the disaster area.

参考文献/References:

崔建文,卢大伟,高东,等.2008.基于合成地震动的震区烈度划分[J].地震研究,31(4):388-393.

金星,张红才,李军,等.2013.地震仪器烈度标准初步研究[J].地球物理学进展,28(5):2336-2351.

金星,张红才,韦永祥,等.2010.基于地震监测台网资料近实时插值计算震动图的初步研究[J].防灾减灾学报,26(1):1-11.

李亮,李山有,纪忠华,等.2018.仪器烈度计算方法研究[J].震灾防御技术,13(4):801-809.

王士成,金星,张红才,等.2017.台网密度对地震烈度速报的影响研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,37(6):162-168.

王玉石,周正华,王伟.2008.基于假设检验的地震动强度(烈度)速报方法[J].地震工程与工程振动,28(5):49-54.

解全才,马 强,张景发.2020.2016年日本熊本MW7.0地震强震动记录特征分析[J].地震研究,43(1):125-133.

徐钦,陈琳荣,张宇,等.2019.吉林松原MS5.7、MS5.1地震强震动记录特征分析[J].地震研究,42(4):627-634.

袁一凡.1998.由地震动三要素确定地震动强度(烈度)的研究[R].哈尔滨:国家地震局工程力学研究所,1-42.

张红才,王士成.2016.地震烈度速报产品可靠性分析[J].地震工程与工程振动,36(5):65-75.

张红才.2008.基于地震监测台网资料的震动图及震动烈度研究[D].哈尔滨:中国地震局工程力学研究所.

中国地震局.2015.仪器地震烈度计算规程(试行)[S].

Wald D J,Vincent Q,Heaton T H,et al.1999.Relationship between peak ground acceleration,peak ground velocity,and Modified Mercalli Intensity in California[J].Earthquake Spectra,15(3):557-564.

Karim K R,Yamazaki F.2002.Correlation of JMA instrumental seismic intensity with strong motion parameters[J].Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,31(5):1191-1212.

Shabestari K T,Yamazaki F.2001.A proposal of instrumental seismic intensity scale compatible with MMI evaluated from three-component acceleration records[J].Earthquake Spectra,17(4):711-723.

GB/T 17742—2008,中国地震烈度表[S].

GB/T 17742—2020,中国地震烈度表[S].

DB35/T 1308—2012,地震仪器烈度表[S].

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2021-06-21
基金项目:云南省地震局科技人员传帮带培养项目(CX2-2021001)资助.

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-10-20