|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]路沙沙,徐 红,张亚楠,等.基于IDA方法的加固震损RC框架结构地震易损性分析[J].地震研究,2021,44(04):673-681.
　LU Shasha,XU Hong,ZHANG Yanan,et al.Seismic Fragility Analysis of Reinforced RC Frame Structure with Seismic Damage Based on Incremental Dynamic Analysis[J].Journal of Seismological Research,2021,44(04):673-681.
点击复制

基于IDA方法的加固震损RC框架结构地震易损性分析(PDF/HTML)

《地震研究》[ISSN:1000-0666/CN:53-1062/P]

卷:
44
期数:
2021年04期
页码:
673-681
栏目:
出版日期:
2021-11-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
Seismic Fragility Analysis of Reinforced RC Frame Structure with Seismic Damage Based on Incremental Dynamic Analysis
作者:
路沙沙1; 徐 红1; 张亚楠1; 谢雨航2; 刘少栋1
(1.辽宁工程技术大学 土木工程学院,辽宁 阜新 123000; 2.同济大学建筑设计研究院(集团)有限公司,上海 200092)
Author(s):
LU Shasha1; XU Hong1; ZHANG Yanan1; XIE Yuhang2; LIU Shaodong1
(1.School of Civil Engineering,Liaoning Technical University,Fuxin 123000,Liaoning,China;2.Tongji Architectural Design(Group)Co.,Ltd.,Shanghai 200029,China)
关键词:
增量动力分析;  加固震损;  RC框架结构;  地震易损性分析;  加固效果
Keywords:
incremental dynamic analysis;  seismic damage to the reinforced concrete;  RC frame structure;  seismic fragility analysis;  reinforcement effect
分类号:
TU375.4
DOI:
-
摘要:
基于Perform-3D软件,采用碳纤维加固和粘钢加固方法对震损后的混凝土框架进行加固。分别以3、6、9层RC框架结构为研究对象,采用基于增量动力分析(IDA)的地震易损性分析方法,对震损RC框架结构的地震易损性进行研究并分析其加固效果。结果表明:①随着高度和PGA的增加,3、6、9层震损后的碳纤维和粘钢加固结构IDA曲线簇的整体收敛性均较好; ②总体上粘钢加固可以提高结构对地震动随机性的收敛性,但随着结构高度的增加,对于地震动随机收敛性的增益效果逐渐减弱,该加固方法对3层高度的震损低层框架结构加固效果明显; ③碳纤维加固对于结构层间位移角的控制能力较粘钢加固更强,对于6层高度的震损中层框架结构,可以更大程度地提高其对罕遇地震的抵抗能力; ④对适用于9层高度的震损高层框架结构,可根据实际情况选择两种加固方法中的任何一种,均可以取得较好的加固效果。
Abstract:
Aiming at the seismic damage of reinforced concrete(RC)frame structures,and based on Perform-3D software,we adopt two reinforcement methods,carbon-fiber reinforcement and steel-bonded reinforcement to reinforce the earthquake-damaged concrete frame structures.Taking three-layer,six-layer and nine-layer RC frame structures as examples,we study the seismic fragility of RC frame structures with seismic damage and analyze their reinforcement effect based on incremental dynamic analysis(IDA).The results show that with the increase of strctrure’s height and PGA,the overall convergence of the IDA-curve clusters of the carbon-fiber and steel-bonded reinforced structures at the third,sixth,and ninth layer are better after being damaged by earthquakes.The steel-bonded reinforcement can improve the convergence of the structure to the randomness of ground motions,but with the increase of the structure’s height,the effect of steel-bonded reinforcement on the random convergence of ground motion gradually weakens,and the steel-bonded reinforcement method has obvious effect on the three-layer,low-rise structures.The carbon-fiber reinforcement has better control of the displacement angle between the structural layers than the steel-bonded reinforcement.For the six-layer,middle-rise structures,the resistance of the structure to extremely rare earthquakes can be improved to a greater extent.For the nine-layer,high-rise structures,the two reinforcement methods are practical,and we can choose one of them according to the actual situation.

参考文献/References:

崔济东,沈雪龙.2017.Perform-3D原理与实例[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社.
黄建锋,朱春明,龚治国,等.2012.增大截面法加固震损钢筋混凝土框架的抗震性能试验研究[J].土木工程学报,45(12):9-17.
金建敏,肖骥,谭平,等.2020.基于IDA方法的基础隔震结构失效模式研究[J].地震研究,43(3):463-470.
吕大刚,代旷宇,于晓辉,等.2017.FRP加固非延性RC框架结构的地震易损性分析[J].工程力学,34(S1):49-53,70.
吕西林,苏宁粉,周颖.2012.复杂高层结构基于增量动力分析法的地震易损性分析[J].地震工程与工程振动,32(5):19-25.
任浩,田勤虎,张炜超.2019.基于IDA方法的钢筋混凝土框架结构地震易损性分析[J].建筑结构,49(S2):350-355.
王东超.2016.结构地震易损性分析中地震动记录选取方法研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学.
王涵平.2016.基于IDA的无粘结预应力装配式框架结构地震易损性分析[D].成都:西南交通大学.
王亚勇,程民宪,刘小弟.1992.结构抗震时程分析法输入地震记录的选择方法及其应用[J].建筑结构,(5):3-7.
闫磊,曹磊,杨恺.2019.基于IDA的自锚式悬索桥地震易损性分析[J].重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版),38(11):41-45.
杨成,康军立,张斌.2014.滞回模型修正和地震动特征对IDA的影响分析[J].工程力学,31(S1):253-257.
叶列平,马千里,缪志伟.2009.结构抗震分析用地震动强度指标的研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,29(4):9-22.
钟紫蓝,申轶尧,郝亚茹.2020.基于IDA方法的两层三跨地铁地下结构地震易损性分析[J].岩土工程学报,42(5):916-924.
朱健.2013.结构动力学原理与地震易损性分析[M].北京:科学出版社.
朱俊涛,黄光辉,高朝阳.2016.CFRP布加固损伤RC框架结构Pushover分析[J].世界地震工程,32(4):253-258.
Do T N,Filippou F C.2018.A damage model for structures with degrading response[J].Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics,47(2):311-332.
FEMA.2000.Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings:FEMA-356[S].Washington D C:Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Herrera J P,Bedoya R D,Hyrtado J E.2020.Performance-based seismic assessment of precast ferrocement walls for one and two-storey housing[J].Engineering Structures,214:100589.
Li S Q,Yu T L,Chen Y S.2019.Comparative analysis of the empirical seismic vulnerability of typical structures in multiple intensity zones[J].Archives of Civil Engineering,65(3):167-183.
Mamuna A A,Saatcioglu M.2019.Analytical modeling of moderately ductile RC frame structures for seismic performance evaluation Using PERFORM-3D[J].Earthquake Spectra,35(2):635-652.
Mander J B,Priestley M J N,Park R.1988.Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,114(8):1804-1826.
Park Y J,Ang A H S.1985.Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced Concrete[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,ASCE,111(4):722-739.
Park Y J,Ang A H S,Wen Y K.1985.Seismic damage analysis of reinforced concrete buildings[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,ASCE,111(4):740-757.
Vamvatsikos D,Cornell C A.2002.Incremental dynamic analysis[J].Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics,31(3):491-514.
DBJ/T 15-151—2019,建筑工程混凝土结构抗震性能设计规程[S].
GB 50009—2012,建筑结构荷载规范[S].
GB 50010—2010,混凝土结构设计规范[S].

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2020-12-04
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(51474045、51774173)资助.

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-11-10