|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]贾东辉,余怀忠,赵彬彬,等.基于加卸载响应比理论的断层氢气异常机理研究[J].地震研究,2025,(02):210-219.[doi:10.20015/j.cnki.ISSN1000-0666.2025.0022 ]
 JIA Donghui,YU Huaizhong,ZHAO Binbin,et al.Research on Fault Hydrogen Anomaly Mechanism based on the Load/Unload Response Ratio Theory[J].Journal of Seismological Research,2025,(02):210-219.[doi:10.20015/j.cnki.ISSN1000-0666.2025.0022 ]
点击复制

基于加卸载响应比理论的断层氢气异常机理研究(PDF/HTML)

《地震研究》[ISSN:1000-0666/CN:53-1062/P]

卷:
期数:
2025年02期
页码:
210-219
栏目:
出版日期:
2025-02-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on Fault Hydrogen Anomaly Mechanism based on the Load/Unload Response Ratio Theory
作者:
贾东辉12余怀忠3赵彬彬2张 涛2刘海洋4
(1.成都理工大学 地球与行星科学学院,四川 成都 610059; 2.新疆维吾尔自治区地震局,新疆 乌鲁木齐 830011; 3.中国地震台网中心,北京 100045; 4.阿克苏地区地震监测中心站,新疆 阿克苏 843000)
Author(s):
JIA Donghui12YU Huaizhong3ZHAO Binbin2ZHANG Tao2LIU Haiyang4
(1.College of Earth and Planet Sciences,Chengdu University of Technology,Chengdu 610059,Sichuan,China)(2.Earthquake Agency of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region,Urumqi 830011,Xinjiang,China)(3.China Earthquake Networks Center,Beijing 100045,China)(4.Aksu Earthquake Monitoring Center Station,Aksu 843000,Xinjiang,China)
关键词:
断层氢气 加卸载响应比 异常机理 地震前兆 构造活动
Keywords:
hydrogen Load/Unload Response Ratio anomaly mechanism earthquake precursor tectonic activity
分类号:
P315.72
DOI:
10.20015/j.cnki.ISSN1000-0666.2025.0022
摘要:
使用新疆阿克苏台和库尔勒台断层氢气观测数据,研究氢气的映震能力; 结合潮汐应力与氢气动态变化之间的关系,采用加卸载响应比方法对这2个台断层氢气的异常变化机理和映震机制进行研究,分析潮汐应力加载状态下氢气的响应特征; 对比原始观测数据与加卸载响应比映震效能,提高异常识别能力。结果表明:断层氢气变化具有潮汐效应,在地壳应力加载作用下,对潮汐应力反应灵敏,氢气高值异常多出现在调制时段; 加卸载响应比计算结果显示,相对于原始观测数据异常指标报准率,加卸载响应比的预报效能更优,LURR=1.02可作为断层氢气的异常阈值,超阈值后观测点周边地区短期存在5级以上地震活动危险性。该指标通过了R值检验评估。
Abstract:
The fault's hydrogen data which are observed by Aksu station and Korla station in Xinjiang are used to study the relationship between the tidal stress and the hydrogen dynamics in this area.The Load/Unload Response Ratio(LURR)theory is used to explore the abnormal change mechanism and the earthquake precursory mechanism of the fault's hydrogen,to obtain the response characteristics of the hydrogen under the action of the tidal stress loading.The results show that the variation of fault's hydrogen has tidal effect; it is sensitive to tidal stress in the case of the crustal stress loading.The hydrogen's high-value anomaly occurs mostly in the modulation period.According to the calculation of the Load/Unload Response Ratio,the Load/Unload Response Ratio has better prediction efficiency than the original observation data.The number 1.02 can be used as a threshold for judging the fault's hydrogen anomaly; when LURR value exceeds the threshold,there would exist a risk of moderate-and strong-earthquake in a short term in the study area.This index has passed the R-value test evaluation.

参考文献/References:

车用太,刘耀炜,何钄.2015.断层带土壤气中H2观测——探索地震短临预报的新途径[J].地震,35(4):1-10.
Che Y T,Liu Y W,He L.2015.Hydrogen monitoring in fault zone soil gas:A new approach to short/immediate earthquake prediction[J].Earthquake,35(4):1-10.(in Chinese)
范雪芳,杨芷萌,李宏伟,等.2020.断层带土壤H2浓度变化特征及影响因素研究[J].地震研究,43(2):302-309.
Fan X F,Yang Z M,Li H W,et al.2020.Research on variation characteristic and influence factors of hydrogen concentration in the soil[J].Journal of Seismological Research,43(2):302-309.(in Chinese)
范雪芳,张磊,李自红,等.2016.断裂带土壤气高精度氢异常分析[J].地震地质,38(2):303-315.
Fan X F,Zhang L,Li Z H,et al.2016.High-accuracy analysis of soil hydrogen anomaly in fault zone[J].Seismology and Geology,38(2):303-315.(in Chinese)
方震,张彬,李军辉,等.2020.地热温泉井与土壤逸出气中痕量氢的特征及差异性分析[J].地震工程学报,42(3):705-713.
Fang Z,Zhang B,Li J H,et al.2020.Characteristics and difference of trace hydrogen in escape gas from geothermal hot spring well and soil[J].China Earthquake Engineering Journal,42(3):705-713.(in Chinese)
解朝娣,Lei X L,吴小平,等.2015.潮汐应力对2007年MS6.4宁洱地震震源断层成核失稳过程的影响[J].中国科学:地球科学,45(9):1409-1420.
Xie Z D,Lei X L,Wu X P,et al.2015.Effect of tidal stress on fault nucleation and failure of the 2007 MS6.4 Ning'er earthquake[J].Scientia Sinica Terrae,45(9):1409-1420.(in Chinese)
康健,肖宁,高小其,等.2019.松原5.7级地震震中区土壤氢气变化特征[J].中国地震,35(2):277-285.
Kang J,Xiao N,Gao X Q,et al.2019.Characteristics of soil hydrogen variation after the Songyuan MS5.7 earthquake[J].Earthquake Research in China,35(2):277-285.(in Chinese)
刘春国,晏锐,樊春燕,等.2022.我国地震地下流体监测现状分析及展望[J].地震研究,45(2):161-172.
Liu C G,Yan R,Fan C Y,et al.2022.Analysis and prospect of seismic subsurface fluid monitoring in China[J].Journal of Seismological Research,45(2):161-172.(in Chinese)
刘海洋,赖爱京,冯英,等.2020.2017年9月16日库车MS5.7地震前阿克苏西大桥断层氢气异常可靠性分析[J].内陆地震,34(2):187-195.
Liu H Y,Lai A J,Feng Y,et al.2020.Reliability analysis of hydrogen anomaly in Akesu west bridge fault before Kuche MS5.7 on September 16th,2017[J].Inland Earthquake,34(2):187-195.(in Chinese)
刘兆飞,李营,陈志,等.2019.吉兰泰断陷盆地周缘断裂带气体释放及其对断层活动性的指示意义[J].地震学报,41(5):613-632.
Liu Z F,Li Y,Chen Z,et al.2019.Gas emission from active fault zones around the Jilantai faulted depression basin and its implications for fault activities[J].Acta Seismological Sinica,41(5):613-632.(in Chinese)
马宏生,刘杰,吴昊,等.2004.基于R值评分的年度地震预报能力评价[J].地震,24(2):31-37.
Ma H S,Liu J,Wu H,et al.2004.Scientific evaluation of annual earthquake prediction efficiency based on R-value[J].Earthquake,24(2):31-37.(in Chinese)
孙小龙,邵志刚,司学芸,等.2017.断层带土壤氢气浓度测量及其影响因素[J].大地测量与地球动力学,37(4):436-440.
Sun X L,Shao Z G,Si X Y,et al.2017.Soil hydrogen concentration in fault zone:Analysis of corresponding influence factors[J].Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics,37(4):436-440.(in Chinese)
王喜龙,杨梦尧,郭红霞,等.2022.辽宁盘一井氢气浓度异常特征及预报效能分析[J].地震研究,45(2):275-283.
Wang X L,Yang M Y,Guo H X,et al.2022.Analysis of the anomalies and earthquake prediction efficiency of hydrogen in groundwater in Panjin 1st well,Liaoning province[J].Journal of Seismological Research,45(2):275-283.(in Chinese)
辛建村,孙君嵩,于晨,等.2022.门源MS6.9地震前地电场优势方位角与加卸载响应比异常变化分析[J].地震工程学报,44(2):415-424.
Xin J C,Sun J S,Yu C,et al.2022.Abnormal variation of dominant azimuth and Load/Unload Response Ratio of geoelectric field before the Menyuan MS6.9 earthquake[J].China Earthquake Engineering Journal,44(2):415-424.(in Chinese)
许延军,张学辉,曹勇,等.2022.门源6.9级地震前地应变加卸载响应比异常分析[J].地震工程学报,44(3):707-712.
Xu Y J,Zhang X H,Cao Y,et al.2022.Load/Unload Response Ratio anomalies of strain before the Menyuan 6.9 earthquake[J].China Earthquake Engineering Journal,44(3):707-712.(in Chinese)
闫玮,李新勇,杨绍富,等.2023.新疆库尔勒断层氢气浓度影响因素及异常信息提取方法研究[J].内陆地震,37(1):72-79.
Yan W,Li X Y,Yang S F,et al.2023.Study on influence factors of hydrogen concentration and anomaly information extraction method of Kuerle fault in Xinjiang[J].Inland Earthquake,37(1):72-79.(in Chinese)
尹祥础,陈学忠,宋治平.1994.加卸载响应比理论及其在地震预测中的应用研究进展[J].地球物理学报,(S1):223-230.
Yin X C,Chen X Z,Song Z P.1994.Research progress of Load-Unloading Response Ratio theory and its application in earthquake prediction[J].Chinese Journal of Ceophysics,(S1):223-230.(in Chinese)
尹祥础,尹灿.1991.非线性系统失稳的前兆与地震预报——响应比理论及其应用[J].中国科学:化学,21(5):512-518.
Yin X C,Yin C.1991.Precursors of nonlinear system instability and earthquake prediction—response ratio theory and its application[J].Scientia Sinica Chimica,21(5):512-518.(in Chinese)
尹祥础.1987.地震预测新途径的探索[J].中国地震,3(1):3-10.
Yin X C.1987.The new approach of earthquake prediction[J].Earthquake Research in China,3(1):3-10.(in Chinese)
张先康,赵金仁,张成科,等.2002.帕米尔东北侧地壳结构研究[J].地球物理学报,45(5):665-671.
Zhang X K,Zhao J R,Zhang C K,et al.2002.Crustal structure at the northeast side of the Pamirs[J].Chinese Jourral of Geophysics,45(5):665-671.(in Chinese)
钟骏,王博,闫玮,等.2021.阿克苏断层氢气浓度动态特征及其映震效能[J].地震学报,43(5):1-13.
Zhong J,Wang B,Yan W,et al.2021.Dynamic characteristics of fault hydrogen concentration in Akesu and its earthquake reflecting efficiency[J].Acta Seismological Sinica,43(5):1-13.(in Chinese)
Beckon M,Ritter O,Park S K,et al.2008.A deep crustal fluid channel into the San Andreas fault system near Parkfield,California[J].Geophys J Int,173(2):718-732.
Biagi P F,Castellana L,Minafra A,et al.2006.Groundwater chemical anomalies connected with the Kamchatka earthquake(M=7.1)on March 1992[J].Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences,6(5):853-859.
Byerlee J D.1978.Friction of rocks[J].Pure and Applied Geophysics,116(4-5):615-626.
Chen Z,Li Y,Liu Z F,et al.2018.Radon emission from soil gases in the active fault zones in the capital of China and its environmental effects[J].Scientific Reports,8(1):16772.
Deb A,Gazi M,Ghosh J,et al.2018.Monitoring of soil radon by SSNTD in Eastern India in search of possible earthquake precursor[J].Journal of Environmental Radioactivity,184-185(APR):63-70.
Giuntoli F,Menegon L,Siron G,et al.2024.Methane-hydrogen-rich fluid migration may trigger seismic failure in subdue ction zones at forearc depths[J].Nature Communications,15(1):480.
Jia D H,Zhao B B,Yu H Z,et al.2022.Multi field coupled coseismic changes of the Jiashi MS6.4 earthquake of 19 January 2020,based on ground temperature observation[J].Atmosphere,13(2):154.
Stein R S,King G,Lin J.1994.Stress triggering of the 1994 M6.7 Northridge,California,earthquake by its predecessors[J].Science,265(5177):1432-1435.
Wang L,Jin Z J,Chen X,et al.2023.The origin and occurrence of natural hydrogen[J].Energies,16(5):2400.
Yu H Z,Yu C,Ma Z,et al.2020.Temporal and spatial evolution of Load/Unload Response Ratio before the M7.0 Jiuzhaigou earthquake of Aug.8,2017 in Sichuan province[J].Pure and Applied Geophysics,177(16):321-331.
Zgonnik V.2020.The occurrence and geoscience of natural hydrogen:A comprehensive review[J].Earth-Science Reviews,203(8):103140.
Zhao B B,Qian C,Yu H Z,et al.2022.Preliminary analysis of ionospheric anomalies before strong earthquakes in and around mainland China[J].Atmosphere,13:410.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2024-04-15.
基金项目:中国地震局震情跟踪定向工作任务(2024010313); 国家自然科学基金地震联合基金(U2039205); 国家重点研发计划(2018YFE0109700); 中国地震局监测、预报、科研三结合课题(3JH-202401055).
第一作者简介:贾东辉(1989-),工程师,主要从事地震地下流体与地震预测研究.E-mail:jdh830000@163.com.
通信作者简介:余怀忠(1975-),研究员,主要从事地震孕育机理和预测理论研究.E-mail:yuhz750216@sina.com.
更新日期/Last Update: 2025-03-10