|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]江 鹏,李萍萍,李同林,等.2022年四川泸定MS6.8地震强震动记录特征[J].地震研究,2023,46(04):593-602.[doi:10.20015/j.cnki.ISSN1000-0666.2023.0057]
　JIANG Peng,LI Pingping,LI Tonglin,et al.The Characteristics of Strong Motion Records of the 2022 Luding,Sichuan MS6.8 Earthquake[J].Journal of Seismological Research,2023,46(04):593-602.[doi:10.20015/j.cnki.ISSN1000-0666.2023.0057]
点击复制

2022年四川泸定MS6.8地震强震动记录特征(PDF/HTML)

《地震研究》[ISSN:1000-0666/CN:53-1062/P]

卷:
46
期数:
2023年04期
页码:
593-602
栏目:
出版日期:
2023-12-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Characteristics of Strong Motion Records of the 2022 Luding,Sichuan MS6.8 Earthquake
作者:
江 鹏1; 李萍萍1; 李同林1; 曾 均1; 王 竞1; 苏金蓉1; 温瑞智2
(1.四川省地震局,四川 成都 610041; 2.中国地震局工程力学研究所,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150080)
Author(s):
JIANG Peng1; LI Pingping1; LI Tonglin1; ZENG Jun1; WANG Jing1; SU Jinrong1; WEN Ruizhi2
(1.Sichuan Earthquake Agency,Chengdu 610041,Sichuan,China)(2.Institute of Engineering Mechanics,China Earthquake Administration,Harbin 150080,Heilongjiang,China)
关键词:
泸定地震;  强震动记录;  反应谱;  衰减关系
Keywords:
the Luding MS6.8 earthquake;  strong motion records;  response spectrum;  attenuation relation
分类号:
P315.914
DOI:
10.20015/j.cnki.ISSN1000-0666.2023.0057
摘要:
对地震监测台网获取的2022年四川泸定MS6.8地震的1 799组强震动记录进行处理后计算地震动参数,利用克里金插值方法得到峰值加速度PGA、峰值速度PGV和加速度反应谱的空间分布图。结果表明:基准站、基本站和一般站记录到的地震动峰值依次增大,反映出局部地形和场地条件对地震动的放大作用。高烈度区仪器地震烈度和调查地震烈度较为一致,Ⅵ度以下区域仪器地震烈度和调查地震烈度等值线方向差异较大,反映出在震害不显著情况下两种烈度的对应关系不太理想。初步震相分析发现,近断层台站垂直方向峰值较大,多个台站记录到水平向速度大脉冲现象。基于基岩地震动峰值统计了本次地震的衰减特性,PGV随距离衰减相比中国地震动参数区划图更慢,综合震相特征认为本次地震更符合浅源地震的特点。为进一步分析地震动与震害的关系,选取了2个震害较为严重乡镇的强震动记录计算5%阻尼比的拟加速度反应谱,在设计地震反应谱特征周期Tg取值到1.5 s之间,台站记录反应谱值远超出设计地震反应谱,在部分周期区间还超出了罕遇地震设计反应谱值,体现出反应谱与震害较好的相关性。
Abstract:
At 12:52 on September 5,2022,an MS6.8 earthquake occurred in Luding County,Sichuan Province,China.The Sichuan Earthquake Early Warning Network acquired 1 799 sets of seismic records.The acquisition of high-density strong motion records has great significance for the study of regional ground motion characteristics and source characteristics.In this paper,we calculate the ground motion related parameters of the strong motion records.Using the Kreging interpolation method,we obtain the spatial distribution maps of PGA,PGV,and acceleration response spectrum based on those related parameters.This shows that the peak values of ground motion recorded by the reference stations,the basic stations and the general stations increase successively,reflecting the amplification effect of terrain and site conditions.In the high intensity area,the intensity determined through strong ground motion instruments is consistent with the intensity determined through field investigation.While in the Ⅵ-degree area,there is a striking difference between the instrumental-intensity contour and the survey-intensity contour,which reflects that the instrumental intensity is not consistent with survey intensity in the area where the earthquake damage is light.The seismic phase analysis shows that the peak value in the vertical direction recorded by the stations near the fault is larger,and large horizontal velocity pulses are recorded at several stations.Based on the peak values of ground motion of bedrock,we analyze the attenuation characteristics of the Luding MS6.8 earthquake.Compared with PGV proposed in the Seismic Ground Motion Parameters Zonation Map of China(GB18306—2015),PGV in this Luding earthquake event decays with distance more slowly.The characteristics of seismic phases show this earthquake is more consistent with the characteristics of shallow earthquakes.To further analyze the relationship between the ground motion and the earthquake damage,we select the strong motion records in two areas with severe earthquake damage,and calculate the pseudo-acceleration response spectrum of 5% damping ratio.In the period Tg-1.5 s,the acceleration response spectrum value exceeds the design response spectrum value.In some periods,the acceleration response spectrum value exceeds the response spectrum value of rare earthquakes.Response spectrum has a good correlation with earthquake damage.

参考文献/References:


胡聿贤,张敏政.1984.缺乏强震观测资料地区地震动参数的估计方法[J].地震工程与工程振动,4(1):1-11.
江鹏,李萍萍,李同林,等.2021.2020年10月22日四川北川MS4.7地震强震动特征分析[J].地球与行星物理论评,52(2):1-7.
金星,马强,李山有.2004.利用数字强震仪记录实时仿真地动速度[J].地震工程与工程振动,24(1):49-54.
雷建成,高孟潭,俞言祥.2007.四川及邻区地震动衰减关系[J].地震学报,29(5):500-511.
李宏男,陈国兴.2013.地震工程学[M].北京:机械工业出版社.
李萍萍,江鹏,李同林,等.2022.2021年9月16日四川泸县MS6.0地震强地面运动特征分析[J].地震学报,44(2):260-270.
李山有,金星,陈先,等.2002.地震动强度与地震烈度速报研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,22(6):1-7.
任叶飞,温瑞智,周宝峰,等.2014.2013年4月20日四川芦山地震强地面运动三要素特征分析[J].地球物理学报,57(6):1836-1846.
四川省地震局.应急管理部发布四川泸定6.8级地震烈度图[EB/OL].[2022-09-11](2022-01-10).http://www. scdzj.gov.cn /xwzx/fzjzyw/202209/t20220911_53440.html.
宋晋东,汪源,李山有,等.2017.基于中国大陆强震数据的地震预警震级统计关系[C]// 中国地球物理学会.2017中国地球科学联合学术年会论文集.北京:1879-1881.
温瑞智,任叶飞,黄旭涛,等.2013.芦山7.0级地震强震动记录及其震害相关性[J].地震工程与工程振动,33(4):1-14.
温瑞智,王宏伟.2020.2020年7月12日唐山古冶MS5.1地震的强震动特征[J].地震科学进展,50(7):9-13.
温瑞智.2016.我国强地震动记录特征综述[J].地震学报,38(4):550-563.
俞言祥,李山有,肖亮.2013.为新区划图编制所建立的地震动衰减关系[J].震灾防御技术,8(1):24-33.
俞言祥,汪素云.2006.中国东部和西部地区水平向基岩加速度反应谱衰减关系[J].震灾防御技术,3(1):206-217.
张红才,金星,王士成,等.2017.烈度仪记录与强震及测震记录的对比分析——以2015年河北昌黎ML4.5地震为例[J].地震学报,39(2):273-285.
Boore D M.2005.On pads and filters:processing strong-motion data.[J].Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,95(2):745-750.
Ji K,Ren Y,Wen R.2017.Site classification for National Strong Motion Observation Network System(NSMONS)stations in China using an empirical H/V spectral ratio method[J].Journal of Asian Earth Sciences.147(1):79-94.
GB 18306—2015,中国地震动参数区划图[S].
GB 50011—2010,建筑抗震设计规范[S].
GB/T 17742—2020,中国地震烈度表[S].


备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2022-01-15.
基金项目:四川省地震局科技专项(LY2303); 科技部重点研发专题项目(2018YFC1504003-04).
第一作者简介:江 鹏(1987-),高级工程师,主要从事地震监测和工程地震研究.E-mail:jiangpeng@scdzj.gov.cn.
通讯作者简介:苏金蓉(1971-),正研级高级工程师,主要从事地震监测预警研究.E-mail:sujr0816@163.com.
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-10-01