地震研究

收集2015年宁夏、甘肃和青海地震台网63个三分量地震台站观测到的远震波形数据,使用H-k扫描法研究了区域地壳厚度和平均波速比。地壳厚度分布清晰地展示出自东向西地壳厚度不断增加的趋势,并伴随着2个地壳深度梯度带。研究区域平均地壳厚度为50.8 km,显著高于大陆地壳平均厚度; 平均波速比为1.73,对应泊松比为0.25,略低于大陆平均泊松比(0.265)。分析认为研究区域中东部地壳增厚主要发生在上地壳,长英质岩石含量增加使整体泊松比下降。某些区域表现出超高的泊松比,推测这些区域可能存在岩石部分熔融现象。古浪大地震、海原大地震和这次门源地震都发生在泊松比梯度带和地壳厚度梯度带泊松比较低的一侧。

Using the collected earthquake waveform data of Menyuan M_S6.4 earthquake recorded by 63 3-compoents earthquake stations in regional seismic network in 2015,we calculated regional crustal thickness and velocity ratio by H-k scan method.The distribution of crustal thickness clearly showed a increasing trend from east to west with two remarkable crustal thickness gradient band zone.The average crustal thickness is 50.8 km,which is significantly thicker than average thickness of continental crust and the average Poisson's ratio is 0.25,which is a little lower than continental average value 0.265.We analyzed the studying results and found that the crust thickening in the middle east of the study area mainly occurred in the upper crust,the increase of the content of the felsic rock resulting in the low Poisson's ratio.The super high Poisson's ratio appears in some areas,we deduce that there exit the partial melting.The Gulang earthquake,Haiyuan earthquake and Menyuan earthquake all occurred near the gradient zones of Poisson's ratio and crustal thickness,and the side of low Poisson's ratio.

引言
1 资料选取与研究方法
2 研究结果
3 讨论
4 结论

图1 中国一级块体分布图(a)以及研究区地震台站、主要断裂和块体分布(b)<br/>Fig.1 Distribution of first-order seismic blocks in China(a)and seismic stations,main faults and terranes(b)in the study area

图1 中国一级块体分布图(a)以及研究区地震台站、主要断裂和块体分布(b)
Fig.1 Distribution of first-order seismic blocks in China(a)and seismic stations,main faults and terranes(b)in the study area

图2 地震事件分布以及投影的中心点<br/>Fig.2 Distribution of earthquake events used in this study and the center point of projection

图2 地震事件分布以及投影的中心点
Fig.2 Distribution of earthquake events used in this study and the center point of projection

图3 甘肃AXX台接收函数H-k图像(a)与接收函数(b)展示<br/>Fig.3 Diagram of H-k domain(a)and the corresponding receiver functions(b)for AXX station in Gansu

图3 甘肃AXX台接收函数H-k图像(a)与接收函数(b)展示
Fig.3 Diagram of H-k domain(a)and the corresponding receiver functions(b)for AXX station in Gansu

表1 台站下方地壳厚度与平均波速比及其误差<br/>Tab.1 The thickness of the crustal and velocity ratio and its error beneath seismic stations

表1 台站下方地壳厚度与平均波速比及其误差
Tab.1 The thickness of the crustal and velocity ratio and its error beneath seismic stations

表2 部分已有研究成果汇总<br/>Tab.2 Some results derived from published papers

表2 部分已有研究成果汇总
Tab.2 Some results derived from published papers

图4 Moho面深度分布图(图中标识的断裂和构造块体同图1)<br/>Fig.4 Distribution of Moho depth in the study area(the signed faults and tectonic block is same as Fig.1)

图4 Moho面深度分布图(图中标识的断裂和构造块体同图1)
Fig.4 Distribution of Moho depth in the study area(the signed faults and tectonic block is same as Fig.1)

图5 波速比(k)分布图(图中断裂标识同图1)<br/>Fig.5 Distribution of velocity ratio(k)(the signed faults is same as Fig.1)

图5 波速比(k)分布图(图中断裂标识同图1)
Fig.5 Distribution of velocity ratio(k)(the signed faults is same as Fig.1)

图6 不同区域台站下方平均波速比与地壳厚度关系<br/>Fig.6 Relationship between average velocity ratio and crustal thickness beneath seismic stations in different zones

图6 不同区域台站下方平均波速比与地壳厚度关系
Fig.6 Relationship between average velocity ratio and crustal thickness beneath seismic stations in different zones

陈九辉,刘启元,李顺成等.2005.青藏高原东北缘—鄂尔多斯地块地壳上地幔S波速度结构[J].地球物理学报,48(2):333-342.
崔笃信,王庆良,胡亚轩等.2009.青藏高原东北缘岩石圈变形及其机理[J].地球物理学报,52(6):1490-1499.
嘉世旭,张先康.2008.青藏高原东北缘深地震测深震相研究与地壳细结构[J].地球物理学报,51(5):1431-1443.
李永华,吴庆举,安张辉.2006.青藏高原东北缘地壳S波速度结构与泊松比及其意义[J].地球物理学报,45(9):1359-1368.
刘启民,俊猛,卢芳等.2014.用接收函数方法反演青藏高原东北缘地壳结构[J].中国科学:地球科学,44(4):668-679.
刘文邦,网培玲,马玉虎.2014.青海东北部地区多台波速比研究[J].地震研究,37(增刊1):45-49.
马玉虎,殷翔,苏有锦.2014.西北地区MS≥7强震前地震活特征和近期强震趋势研究[J].地震研究,37(增刊1):8-15.
沈旭章,周元泽,张元生等.2013.青藏高原东北缘地壳结构变化的地球动力学意义[J].地球物理学进展,28(5):2273-2282.
姚志祥,王椿镛,曾融生等.2014.利用接收函数方法研究西秦岭构造带及其邻区地壳结构[J].地震学报,36(1):1-19.
赵金仁,李松林,张先康等.2005.青藏高原东北缘莫霍界面的三维空间构造特征[J].地球物理学报,48(1):78-85.
Ammon C J,Randall G E,Zandt G.1990.On the nonuniqueness of receiver function inversions[J].Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth,95(B10):15303-15318.
Cassidy J F.1992.Numerical experiments in broadband receiver function analysis[J].Neuroscience Letters,139(1):97-99.
Christensen N I.1996.Poisson's ratio and crustal seismology[J].Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth,101(B2):3139-3156.
Ji S,Qian W,Matthew H S.2009.Composition and tectonic evolution of the Chinese continental crust constrained by Poisson's ratio[J].Tectonophysics,463(1-4):15-30.
Langston C A.1979.Structure under Mount Rainier,Washington,inferred from teleseismic body waves[J].Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres,84(B9):4749-4762.
Ligorría J P,Ammon C J.1999.Iterative deconvolution and receiver-function estimation[J].Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,89(5):1395-1400.
Pan S,Niu F.2011.Large contrasts in crustal structure and composition between the Ordos plateau and the NE-Tibetan plateau from receiver function analysis[J].Earth & Planetary Science Letters,303(3-4):291-298.
Ryberg T,Weber M.2000.Receiver function arrays:a reflection seismic approach[J].Geophysical Journal International,141(1):1-11.
Zandt G,Myers S C,Wallace T C.1995.Crust and mantle structure across the Basin and Range-Colorado Plateau boundary at 37°N latitude and implications for Cenozoic extensional mechanism[J].J Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres,1001(B6):10529-10548.
Zhu L,Kanamori H.2000.Moho depth variation in southern California from teleseismic receiver functions[J].Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth,105(B2):2969-2980.

备注

引言

1 资料选取与研究方法

2 研究结果

3 讨论

4 结论

期刊信息