|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]刘 伟,史浙明,吕少杰,等.井水位气压效率计算方法的对比研究——以云南高大井为例[J].地震研究,2024,47(02):191-199.[doi:10.20015/j.cnki.ISSN1000-0666.2024.0010 ]
 LIU Wei,SHI Zheming,LYU Shaojie,et al.Comparison of the Methods of Barometric Efficiency Estimation by Water Level:An Application to Gaoda Well in Yunnan[J].Journal of Seismological Research,2024,47(02):191-199.[doi:10.20015/j.cnki.ISSN1000-0666.2024.0010 ]
点击复制

井水位气压效率计算方法的对比研究——以云南高大井为例(PDF/HTML)

《地震研究》[ISSN:1000-0666/CN:53-1062/P]

卷:
47
期数:
2024年02期
页码:
191-199
栏目:
出版日期:
2023-12-01

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comparison of the Methods of Barometric Efficiency Estimation by Water Level:An Application to Gaoda Well in Yunnan
作者:
刘 伟1史浙明1吕少杰1齐之钰1杨培杰2
(1.中国地质大学(北京)水资源与环境学院,北京 100083; 2.山东省国土空间生态修复中心,山东 济南 250014)
Author(s):
LIU Wei1SHI Zheming1LYU Shaojie1QI Zhiyu1YANG Peijie2
(1.School of Water Resources and Environment,China University of Geosciences,Beijing 100083,China)(2.Shandong Land and Space Ecological Restoration Center,Jinan 250014,Shandong,China)
关键词:
大气压力 井水位 气压效率 云南高大井
Keywords:
stress field the grid-trial method the grid-search method confidence interval Hunan region
分类号:
P315.723
DOI:
10.20015/j.cnki.ISSN1000-0666.2024.0010
摘要:
为了研究不同井水位气压效率计算方法的原理及差异性,基于2019年2月1日至2020年7月28日云南高大井的气压与水位数据,使用Clark方法、Rahi方法、回归反卷积法和Acworth方法计算了该井的气压效率BE值,分别为:0.439 5、0.496 8、0.617 4和0.665 4,平均值为0.554 8。对比分析结果表明:Clark方法和Rahi方法的优点是计算简单方便,但是没有考虑时间滞后的影响; 回归反卷积法可以获得BE值随滞后时间的变化情况,但是极易受到降水、蒸散发等信号的影响; Acworth方法考虑了固体潮信号并且避免了降水、蒸散发等信号的干扰,但是该方法仅适用于承压和半承压含水层中。最后,根据4种方法的特点和适用性,对不同目的下的井水位气压效应分析给出了相应的建议。
Abstract:
On the basis of the data of barometric pressure and water level in Gaoda Well in Yunnan from February 1,2019 to July 28,2020,we calculated the well's barometric-efficiency values with the Clark method,the Rahi method,the regression deconvolution method,and the Acworth method,and compared the calculated values from these four methods,so as to study the principles and difference of these four methods.The barometric-efficiency values were 0.4395,0.4968,0.6174 and 0.6654 respectively,and the average is 0.5548.The calculation of the Clark method and the Rahi method is simple and convenient,but the effect of time lag is neglected by these two methods.The variation of the barometric-efficiency values with lag time can be obtained by the regression deconvolution method,but this method is highly susceptible to the influence of signals like precipitation and evapotranspiration.The Acworth method takes into account the earth tide signal and avoids the interference of precipitation and evapotranspiration signals,but it is only applicable to confined and semi-confined aquifers.Finally,according to the characteristics and applicability of the four methods,we proposed suggestions for the selection of different methods of calculating the barometric efficiency under different conditions.

参考文献/References:

-

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2022-10-08.
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(41972251).
第一作者简介:刘 伟(1998-),硕士研究生在读,主要从事地下水对气压和固体潮的响应研究.E-mail:1635474420@qq.com.
通信作者简介:史浙明(1988-),教授,主要从事地下水方面的研究.E-mail:szm@cugb.edu.cn.
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-03-20