[1]YANG Li,LIU Feng,GUAN Chaokang,et al.Analysis on Comparison Observation Test Results of Two Different Types of Mercury Detector[J].Journal of Seismological Research,2016,39(03):479-485.
Copy

Analysis on Comparison Observation Test Results of Two Different Types of Mercury Detector

Journal of Seismological Research[ISSN 1000-0666/CN 53-1062/P] Volume: 39 Number of periods: 2016 03 Page number: 479-485 Column: Public date: 2016-07-23
Title:
Analysis on Comparison Observation Test Results of Two Different Types of Mercury Detector
Author(s):
YANG Li1;  LIU Feng1;  GUAN Chaokang2;  ZHANG Shuhua2;  ZHU Peiyao1
(1.Earthquake Administration of Yunnan Province, Kunming 650224, Yunnan, China)(2.Earthquake Administration of Mile Multiple, Mile 652300, Yunnan, China)
Keywords:
Hg observation;  mercury detector;  comparative analysis;  co-seismic response
CLC:
P315.63
DOI:
-
Abstract:
Under the same observation condition, we selected Midongshao Well in Mile and compared the observation curves recorded by ATG-6138M Trace Mercury Automatic Analyzer and DFG-B and RG-BQZ Digital Intelligent Mercury Detectors. The comparison result of observation curve and the instrument parameter showed that the detection limit, sensitivity and stability of ATG-6138M Trace Mercury Automatic Analyzer were better than that of DFG-B and RG-BQZ Digital Intelligent Mercury Detectors. The observation curve recorded by ATG-6138M Trace Mercury Automatic Analyzer had the obvious the daily variation, and could record the co-seismic variation.
References:
-
Similar References:

Memo

-

Last Update: 1900-01-01

Online：838       Total Traffic Statistics：4261792

Copyright：Editorial Office of Journal of Seismological Research
Address：148 Beichen Street, North District of Kunming City, Yunnan, China Tel: 86-0871-3355074